guuvestВестник университетаVestnik Universiteta1816-42772686-8415State University of Management10.26425/1816-4277-2021-2-13-20guuvest-2682Research ArticleСТРАТЕГИИ И ИННОВАЦИИSTRATEGIES AND INNOVATIONSГАРМОНИЗАЦИЯ УПРАВЛЕНЧЕСКИХ ПРОЦЕССОВ В ОБЩЕСТВЕННОМ СЕКТОРЕ КАК АКТУАЛЬНАЯ ТЕНДЕНЦИЯ НОВОГО ПОКОЛЕНИЯ ВЛАСТИHARMONIZATION OF MANAGEMENT PROCESSES IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR AS AN ACTUAL TREND OF THE NEW GENERATION OF POWERhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-547XБеспамятноваМ.BespamiatnovaM.

аспирант, 

Москва

Postgraduate student, 

Moscow 

marina.bespamiatnova@gmail.comРоссийский университет дружбы народовРоссияRUDN UniversityRussian Federation202130032021021320Copyright © Беспамятнова М., 20212021Беспамятнова М.Bespamiatnova M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.guu.ru/jour/article/view/2682

Ключевой целью данного исследования является анализ концепции гармонизации функций институтов государственного управления, выявление принципов и характеристик гармоничного управления, применимых в структурах управления общественного сектора, а также перспективы повышения эффективности его деятельности. Исследование носит прикладной характер. В рамках исследования проведен анализ принципов различных моделей управления, а также сравнительный анализ их взаимодействия в формате концепции гармоничного управления. Кроме того, в статье представлены результаты анализа векторов применения концепции гармоничного управления, которые могут быть адаптированы к организациям общественного сектора; поднят вопрос содержания процесса гармонизации и его этапов. В статье сформулированы целевые ориентиры применения концепции гармонизации управления в общественном секторе, предложения и заключения о различных вариациях и особенностях подходов к гармонизации управления. Основой данной работы является анализ иностранной научной литературы, нормативных и аналитических документов, а также их синтез, систематизация, сравнительный анализ, и изучение конкретных случаев. Эмпирическое исследование проведено с помощью метода количественной стандартизации экспертных мнений. Кроме того, использован метод визуализации. 

The key objective of this study is to analyse the concept of harmonization of the functions of public administration institutions and to identify the principles and characteristics of harmonious management applicable in the management structures of the public sector, as well as the prospects for improving the efficiency of its activities. The research is applied in nature. Within the study, the author carries out the analysis of various management models, as well as a comparative analysis of their interaction in the format of the concept of harmonious management. In addition, the article presents the results of the analysis of the vectors of application of the concept of harmonious management, which can be adapted to the organizations of the public sector; raises the issue of the content of the harmonization process and its stages. The article formulates the target guidelines for the application of the management harmonization concept in the public sector, proposals and conclusions on various variations and features of approaches to management harmonization. This paper is based on the analysis of foreign scientific literature, regulatory and analytical documents, as well as their synthesis, systematization, comparative analysis, and the study of specific cases. The author conducts an empirical study using the method of quantitative standardization of expert opinions. In addition, the article uses the visualization method. 

гармоничное управлениеобщественный секторгармонизацияуправленческие моделиорганы общественной властипубличное администрированиеконцепция гармоничного управленияобщественные организацииинституты государственного управленияHarmonious governancepublic sectorharmonizationmanagement modelpublic authoritiespublic administrationharmonious governance conceptpublic organizationsinstitutes of public administrationReferencesAugustinaitis A., Rudzkienė V., Petrauskas R. A., Dagytė I., Martinaitytė E., Leichteris E., Žilionienė I. Lithuanian e. government guidelines: foresight study: Collective monograph. – Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University Publishing Center, 2009. – Рp. 69-72.Augustinaitis A., Rudzkienė V., Petrauskas R. A., Dagytė I., Martinaitytė E., Leichteris E., Žilionienė I. Lithuanian e. government guidelines: foresight study. Collective monograph, Vilnius, Mykolas Romeris University Publishing Center, 2009, pp. 69-72.Čiegis, R., Grunda, R. Company transformation into a cohesive business process // Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. – 2007. – Рp. 19-33.Čiegis R., Grunda R. Company transformation into a cohesive business process, Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 2007, pp. 19-33.Domarkas, V. Nukreipiantis Jungtinių Tautų Organizacijos vaidmuo viešojo administravimo raidos procesuose [Руководящая роль Организации Объединенных Наций в развитии государственного управления] // Viešoji Politika Ir Administravimas [Публичная политика и управление]. – 2014. – No. 23. – Pp. 7-15.Domarkas V. Nukreipiantis Jungtinių Tautų Organizacijos vaidmuo viešojo administravimo raidos procesuose [Guiding role of the United Nations in the development of Public Administration], Viešoji politika ir administravimas [Public Policy and Administration], 2014, no. 23, pp. 7-15.Follet, M. P., Dynamic administration. – 1941. – Рp. 11-15.Follet M.P., Dynamic administration, 1941, pp. 11-15.Giedraitytė, V., Raipa, A. Innovation implementation of interference in modern public management // Public Policy and Administration. – 2012. – No. 11 (2). – Pp. 187-197.Giedraitytė V., Raipa A. Innovation implementation of interference in modern public management, Public Policy and Administration, 2012, no. 11(2), pp. 187-197.Guogis, A., Kacevičius, R., Stasiukynas, A. Municipalities and non-governmental organizations in two Lithuanian districts: View from two models // Facta Universitatis. – 2010. – No. 9 (1). – Pp. 73-97Guogis A., Kacevičius R., Stasiukynas A., Municipalities and non-governmental organizations in two Lithuanian districts: View from two models, Facta Universitatis, 2010, no. 9 (1), pp. 73-97.He, H., Antonio, N., Trigo, V. HeXie management theory and sustainable development // African Journal of Business Management. – 2012. – No. 50. – Pp. 12005-12015.He H., Antonio N., Trigo V. HeXie management theory and sustainable development, African Journal of Business Management, 2012, no. 50, pp. 12005-12015.Indriūnas, A.V., Makštutis, A. Public management strategy Lithuania. The fifth constitution. – Vilnius: Firidas, 2008. – Pp. 24-38.Indriūnas A.V., Makštutis A. Public management strategy Lithuania. The fifth constitution, Vilnius, Firidas, 2008, pp. 24-38.Lin, S. Application of business niche in strategic management: A study, based on oriental idea of harmony // Modern Economy. – 2015. – No. 6 (2). – Pp. 217-222; http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2015.62019.Lin S. Application of business niche in strategic management: A study, based on oriental idea of harmony, Modern Economy, 2015, no. 6 (2), pp. 217-222; http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/me.2015.62019.Raipa, A., Petukienė, E. Customer participation in public services: general services // Public Policy and Administration. – 2009. – No. 27. – Pp. 54-62.Raipa A., Petukienė E. Customer participation in public services: general services, Public Policy and Administration. 2009, no. 27, pp. 54-62.Raipa, A. Innovative developments in the twenty-first century public management // Public Policy and Administration. – 2012. – No. 11 (2). – Pp. 357-359.Raipa, A. Innovative developments in the twenty-first century public management, Public Policy and Administration, 2012, no. 11 (2), pp. 357-359.Smalskys, V., & Skietrys, E. Public Management modernization aspects and problems of implementation // Public Policy and Administration. – 2014. – No. 24. – Pp. 60-67.Smalskys V., Skietrys E. Public Management modernization aspects and problems of implementation, Public Policy and Administration, 2014, no. 24, pp. 60-67.Urmoniene, D. Harmonious management in public sector // Research for Rural Development. – 2016. – V. 2. – Pp. 218-225.Urmoniene D. Harmonious management in public sector, Research for Rural Development, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 218-225.Volmert, A. Indigenous self-determination and freedom from rule // The Good Society. – 2010. – No. 19 (2). – Pp. 53-59.Volmert A. Indigenous self-determination and freedom from rule, The Good Society, 2010, no. 19 (2), pp. 53-59.XI, Youming, Xiao, Hongwen, Hong, Tao HeXie management theory and its new development in the principles // Chinese Journal of Management. – 2005. – Pр. 23-28.XI Youming, Xiao Hongwen, Hong Tao HeXie management theory and its new development in the principles, Chinese Journal of Management, 2005, pр. 23-28.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.