guuvestВестник университетаVestnik Universiteta1816-42772686-8415State University of Management10.26425/1816-4277-2024-10-196-204guuvest-5624Research ArticleСОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ В ПСИХОЛОГИИCURRENT TRENDS IN PSYCHOLOGYЧувствительность к справедливости молодых людей с различным уровнем достатка как актуальная социально-психологическая проблемаJustice sensitivity of youth with different levels of income as an actual socio-psychological problemhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-1538-9774ДементьевА. С.DementievA. S.

Дементьев Алексей Сергеевич - аспирант

г. Москва

Alexey S. Dementiev - Postgraduate Student

Moscow

alexdemon7771999@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-205XЦветковаН. А.TsvetkovaN. A.

Цветкова Надежда Александровна - д-р психол. наук, гл. науч. сотр.

г. Москва

Nadezhda A. Tsvetkova - Dr. Sci. (Psy.), Chief Researcher

Moscow

tsvetkovana@yandex.ruГосударственный университет просвещенияРоссияFederal State University of EducationRussian FederationНаучно-исследовательский институт Федеральной службы исполнения наказанийРоссияResearch Institute of the Federal Penitentiary ServiceRussian Federation202406122024010196204Copyright © Дементьев А.С., Цветкова Н.А., 20242024Дементьев А.С., Цветкова Н.А.Dementiev A.S., Tsvetkova N.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestnik.guu.ru/jour/article/view/5624

Обоснована актуальность изучения социально-психологических детерминант чувствительности к справедливости у российской молодежи с различным уровнем достатка. Раскрыто само понятие чувствительности к справедливости, представлена его структура и показана эволюция; приведено понятие достатка. Охарактеризованы четыре роли, которые может занимать человек в ситуациях, субъективно воспринимаемых им как несправедливые («жертва» – несправедливость совершается по отношению к нему; «свидетель» – он наблюдает несправедливость по отношению к другому; «бенефициар» – человек получает выгоду из ситуации несправедливости по отношению к другому; «нарушитель» – он сам поступает несправедливо). Дан обзор отечественных и зарубежных исследований связи чувствительности к справедливости с другими личностными характеристиками, выполненных за последние пять лет на различных выборках. Показаны перспективы исследования различных аспектов этой научной проблемы, в том числе межкультурных различий. Отмечено, что чувствительность к справедливости в современной социальной психологии характеризуется как относительно самостоятельная черта личности, но ее социально-психологическая детерминация мало изучена. Представлена модель эмпирического исследования социально-психологических детерминант чувствительности к справедливости у молодых людей с различным уровнем достатка.

The article substantiates the relevance of studying the socio-psychological determinants of sensitivity to justice in Russian youth with different levels of wealth. The sensitivity to justice concept itself has been revealed, its structure presented and its evolution shown; the wealth concept has been given. Four roles that a person can occupy in situations subjectively perceived as unfair (a ‘victim’ – the injustice is committed towards them; a ‘witness’ – they observe injustice towards another people; a ‘beneficiary’ – a person benefits from the situation of injustice towards another one; a ‘violator’ – they act unfairly) have been characterized. A review of domestic and foreign studies of the relationship among sensitivity to justice and other personality characteristics, carried out over the past five years on various samples, has been given. Prospects for research into various aspects of this scientific problem, including cross-cultural differences, have been shown. Sensitivity to justice in modern social psychology is characterized as a relatively independent personality trait, but its socio-psychological determination is poorly studied. The model of empirical research of socio-psychological determinants of sensitivity to justice in youth with different levels of wealth has been presented.

проблема чувствительности к справедливостипонятие чувствительности к справедливостиструктура чувствительности к справедливостисоциально-психологические детерминантымолодые людисоциально-психологические характеристикидостатокмодель эмпирического исследованияissue of sensitivity to justicesensitivity to justice conceptsensitivity to justice structuresocio-psychological determinantsyouthsocio-psychological characteristicsprosperityempirical research modelReferencesSchmitt M., Neumann R., Montada L. Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research. 1995;4(8):385–407.Schmitt M., Neumann R., Montada L. Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research. 1995;4(8):385–407.Schmitt M. Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI). Personality and individual differences. 1996;1(21):3–20.Schmitt M. Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI). Personality and individual differences. 1996;1(21):3–20.Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Maes J., Arbach D. Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005;21:202–211.Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Maes J., Arbach D. Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005;21:202–211.Schmitt M., Baumert A., Gollwitzer M., Maes J. The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research. 2010;23:211–238.Schmitt M., Baumert A., Gollwitzer M., Maes J. The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research. 2010;23:211–238.Евгеньева А.П. (ред.) Словарь русского языка. М.: Полиграфресурсы; 1999. 698 с.Yevgenieva A.P. (ed.) Russian language dictionary. Moscow: Poligrafresursy; 1999. 698 p. (In Russian).Rudert C., Speckert K. You shouldn’t have shut them out: Justice sensitivity and norm adherence affect moral reactions to observed ostracism. Personality and Individual Differences. 2023;201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111929Rudert C., Speckert K. You shouldn’t have shut them out: Justice sensitivity and norm adherence affect moral reactions to observed ostracism. Personality and Individual Differences. 2023;201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111929Tham Y., Hashimoto T., Karasawa K. The positive and negative effects of justice sensitivity and justice-related emotions in the volunteer’s dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;1(151). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.07.011Tham Y., Hashimoto T., Karasawa K. The positive and negative effects of justice sensitivity and justice-related emotions in the volunteer’s dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;1(151). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.07.011Nicolai S., Franikowski P., Stoll-Kleemann S. Predicting Pro-environmental Intention and Behavior Based on Justice Sensitivity, Moral Disengagement and Moral Emotions – Results of Two Quota-Sampling Surveys. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914366Nicolai S., Franikowski P., Stoll-Kleemann S. Predicting Pro-environmental Intention and Behavior Based on Justice Sensitivity, Moral Disengagement and Moral Emotions – Results of Two Quota-Sampling Surveys. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914366Hong Y., Wang X., Liu L., Su Y., Chen L., Lian R., Liao M. The relationship between social class and subjective wellbeing: A serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002585Hong Y., Wang X., Liu L., Su Y., Chen L., Lian R., Liao M. The relationship between social class and subjective wellbeing: A serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002585Rothschild Z.K., Keefer L.A. Meaningful outrage: Anger at injustice bolsters meaning for justice sensitive individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2022;52:124–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2820Rothschild Z.K., Keefer L.A. Meaningful outrage: Anger at injustice bolsters meaning for justice sensitive individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2022;52:124–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2820Maltese S., Baumert A. Linking longitudinal dynamics of justice sensitivity and moral disengagement. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;136:173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.041Maltese S., Baumert A. Linking longitudinal dynamics of justice sensitivity and moral disengagement. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;136:173–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.041Schlösser T., Steiniger T., Ehlebracht D., Fetchenhauer D. How justice sensitivity predicts equality preferences in simulated democratic systems. Journal of Research in Personality. 2018;73:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.005Schlösser T., Steiniger T., Ehlebracht D., Fetchenhauer D. How justice sensitivity predicts equality preferences in simulated democratic systems. Journal of Research in Personality. 2018;73:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.005Gotmann. A., Bechtoldt M.N., Fetchenhauer D. Breathing to the path of virtue – The effects of justice sensitivity and state mindfulness on cheating behavior in a group performance task. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110851Gotmann. A., Bechtoldt M.N., Fetchenhauer D. Breathing to the path of virtue – The effects of justice sensitivity and state mindfulness on cheating behavior in a group performance task. Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110851Гулевич О.А. Социальная психология справедливости. М.: ИП РАН; 2011. 288 с.Gulevich O.A. Social psychology of justice. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2011. 288 p. (In Russian).Адамян А.А. Чувствительность к справедливости и ее последствия для личности. Психология. Журнал ВШЭ. 2019;3(16):479–490. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-3-479-493Adamyan A.A. Justice Sensitivity and Its Consequences for an Individual. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2019;3(16):479–490. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2019-3-479-493Гайворонская А.А. Переживания студентами вуза несправедливых ситуаций в учебном процессе. Известия Саратовского университета. Серия: Акмеология образования. Психология развития. 2020;1(33):69–76. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-1-69-76Gaivoronskaya A.A. Experience of Unfair Situations in University Students in the Course of Educational Process. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology. 2020;1(33):69–76. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-1-69-76Ермолова Е.О., Чаганова С.А. Границы личности и механизмы психологической защиты студентов с различными типами чувствительности к справедливости. Системная психология и социология. 2022;4(44):28–47. https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2022.44.4.03Ermolova E.O., Chaganova S.A. Boundaries of personality and mechanisms of psychological defense of students with different types of sensitivity to justice. Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2022;4(44):28–47. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2022.44.4.03Ермолова Е.О., Чаганова С.А. Системно-психологический анализ профилей личности с разными типами чувствительности к справедливости. Системная психология и социология. 2023;2(46):93–113. https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2023.46.2.8Ermolova E.O., Chaganova S.A. System-psychological analysis of personality profiles with different types of sensitivity to justice. Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2023;2(46):93–113. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25688/2223-6872.2023.46.2.8Wu M.S., Schmitt M., Zhou C., Nartova-Bochaver S., Astanina N., Khachatryan N., Han B. Examining self-advantage in the suffering of others: Cross-cultural differences in beneficiary and observer justice sensitivity among Chinese, Germans, and Russians. Social Justice Research. 2014;27:231–242.Wu M.S., Schmitt M., Zhou C., Nartova-Bochaver S., Astanina N., Khachatryan N., Han B. Examining self-advantage in the suffering of others: Cross-cultural differences in beneficiary and observer justice sensitivity among Chinese, Germans, and Russians. Social Justice Research. 2014;27:231–242.Baumert A., Maltese S., Reis D., MacLeod C., Tan-Mansukhani R., Galang A.J.R., Salanga M.G., Schmitt M.J. Cross-Cultural Study of Justice Sensitivity and Its Consequences for Cooperation. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020;7(11):899– 907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896895Baumert A., Maltese S., Reis D., MacLeod C., Tan-Mansukhani R., Galang A.J.R., Salanga M.G., Schmitt M.J. Cross-Cultural Study of Justice Sensitivity and Its Consequences for Cooperation. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020;7(11):899– 907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896895Холмогорова А.Б., Воликова С.В., Сорокова М.Г. Стандартизация опросника «Семейные эмоциональные коммуникации». Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2016;4(24):97–125.Kholmogorova A.B., Volikova S.V., Sorokova M.G. Standardisation of the Family Emotional Communications questionnaire. Counselling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2016;4(24):97–125. (In Russian).Эйдемиллер Э.Г., Юстицкис В.В. Психология и психотерапия семьи. 4е изд. СПб: Питер; 2016. 672 с.Eidemiller E.G., Justickis V.V. Psychology and psychotherapy of family. 4th ed. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2016. 672 p. (In Russian).Вассерман Л.И., Иовлев Б.В., М.А. Методика для психологической диагностики уровня социальной фрустированности и ее практическое применение. Методические рекомендации. СПб: НИПНИ им. В.М. Бехтерева; 2004. 28 с.Wasserman L.I., Iovlev B.V., Iovlev M.A. Methodology for psychological diagnostics of the level of social frustration and its practical application. Methodical recommendations. St. Petersburg: National Medical Research Centre of Psychiatry and Neurology named after V. M. Bekhterev; 2004. 28 p. (In Russian).Фетискин Н.П., Козлов В.В., Мануйлов Г.М. Социально-психологическая диагностика развития личности и малых групп. М.: Ин-т психотерапии; 2002. 488 с.Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manuilov G.M. Socio-psychological diagnostics of development of personality and small groups. Moscow: Institute of Psychotherapy; 2002. 488 p. (In Russian).Вязовкина В., Горностаев И., Корниенко Д.С. Адаптация и психометрическая проверка методики «Короткий опросник темной тетрады». Психологический журнал. 2022;5(43):87–98. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920022787-1Vyazovkina V., Gornostaev I., Kornienko D.S. Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Dark Tetrad Short Questionnaire. Psychological Journal. 2022;5(43):87–98. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920022787-1Нестерова А.А. Разработка и валидизация методики «Жизнеспособность личности». Психологический журнал. 2017;4(38):93–108.Nesterova A.A. Development and validation of the Viability of Personality Methodology. Psychological Journal. 2017;4(38):93–108. (In Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.