ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT RISKS IN THE RUSSIAN UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-10-117-125
Abstract
The investment risk evaluation technique for water and sanitation sector in the Russian Federation has been proposed. A review of current legislation revealed that there is no holistic approach to investment risk evaluation for Russian Public-Private Partnership projects in domestic utility sector. The article reveals, that various methods can be used for investment risk evaluation (decision tree, effective percentage rate correction, cost sensitivity analysis and others). The method choice is defined according to the type of investment project, the risk evaluation goal, the available information and the type of the identified investment risk. The proposed investment risk evaluation technique takes due account of Russian utility sector investment projects features and the list of disclosed information.
About the Authors
O. Temnaya
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. Tregubova
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Prikaz Ministerstva ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii «Ob utverzhdenii Metodiki otsenki ehffektivnosti proekta gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva, proekta munitsipalnogo chastnogo partnerstva i opredeleniya ikh sravnitel’nogo preimushchestva» ot 30.11.2015 g. № 894 [Order of the Ministry of Economic Development «About the approval of the methodology to measure PPP’s performance and define its comparative advantage» dated 30.12.2015 № 894]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_192148/ (accessed 31.08.2018).
2. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po otsenke proektov modernizatsii v tselyakh predostavleniya finansovoi podderzhki za schet sredstv Fonda ZhKh na modernizatsiyu sistem kommunalnoi infrastruktury ot 17.02.2016 g. № 644 (izmeneniya ot 06.09.2016 № 695, ot 25.08.2017 № 784) [Guidance on evaluating upgrading projects in order to provide financial support funded through the Fond of ZHKH for upgrading the utility infrastructure dated 17.02.2016 № 644 (redaction from 06.09.2016 № 695, 25.08.2017 № 784)]. Available at: http://fondgkh.ru/modern/metodicheskie-materialyi-i-rekomendatsii/metodicheskie-ukazaniya-po-otsenke-proektov-modernizatsii-v-tselyah-predostavleniya-finansovoy-podderzhki-za-schet-sredstv-fonda-zhkh-na-modernizatsiyu-sistem-kommunalnoy-infrastrukturyi-utverzhdenyi/ (accessed 31.08.2018).
3. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva RF «O predostavlenii finansovoi podderzhki za schet sredstv gosudarstvennoi korporacii – Fonda sodeistviya reformirovaniyu zhilishchno-kommunal’nogo hozyajstva na modernizatsiyu sistem kommunalnoi infrastruktury» ot 26.12.2015 g № 1451 [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation «About providing financial support funded through the State corporation – Assistance Fund of reforming housing and utilities sector» for upgrading the utility infrastructure» dated 26.12.2015 № 1451]. Available at: http://government.ru/docs/21333/(accessed 31.08.2018).
4. Prikaz Federal’nogo agentstva po tekhnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii «Ob utverzhdenii natsionalnogo standarta» ot 01.12.2011 g. № 680-st [Order of the Federal Agency of technical regulation and metrology «On approval of the national standard» dated 01.12.2011 № 680-st]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_264420/ (accessed 31.08.2018).
5. GOST R ISO/MEK 31010-2011 Menegejement riska. Metody otsenki riskov [Risk menegement. Risk assessment methods]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-iso-mek-31010-2011 (accessed 01.09.2018).
6. Prikaz Federalnoi sluzhby po tarifam «Ob utverzhdenii metodicheskih ukazanii po raschetu reguliruemykh tarifov v sfere vodosnabzheniya i vodootvedeniya» ot 27.12.2013 g. № 1746-eh [Order of the Federal Tariff Service «About the approval of the methodology for tariff calculations in the water and sanitation sectors» dated 27.12.2013 № 1746-э (redaction from 29.08.2017]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_159865/ (accessed 31.08.2018).
7. Lipsic I. V., Kossov V. V. Ekonomicheskii analiz realnykh investitsii [The economic analysis of the real investment]. Moscow, Ekonomist, 2004.
8. Koltsova I. V., Ryabyh D. A. Praktika finansovoi diagnostiki i otsenki proektov [Practices of financial analysis and project evaluation]. Moscow, OOO «I. D. Vilyams», 2007, pp.364-407.
9. Sosnova S. Vodosnabzhenie i vodootvedenie: Ot perechnya problem k novoi strategii razvitiya VKH [From list of problems to the new development strategy of housing and public utilities]. STO, 2015, I. 07 (40), pp. 40-42.
10. Gassii M. V. Realizatsiya proektov GChP v sfere vodosnabzheniya i vodootvedeniya: Kriterii uspeha i faktory riska [Implementation of PPP projects in the sector of water supply and wastewater disposal: success criteria and risk factors], Yurist, 2016, I. 24, pp. 41-46.
11. Vishnyakov Ya. D., Radaev N. N. Obshaya teoriya riskov [General theory of risk]. Moscow, Izdatelskij centr «Akademiya», 2008.
12. P3 Toolkit. Risk Valuation and Allocation for Public Private Partnerships (P3s). U.S.Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. 2017. P.1. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/pdfs/fact_sheets/p3_toolkit_02_riskvalutationandallocation.pdf/ (accessed 31.08.2018).
13. Public Private Reference Guide. Version 2.0, The World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and Inter-American Development Bank, 2014, pp. 145-155.
14. Guidebook for Risk Assessment in Public Private Partnerships. U. S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration, December 2013, pp. 37-46.
15. Marin Ph. Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Water Utilities: A Review of Experience in Developing Countries. The World Bank, PPIAF, Washington, D.C., 2009. 191 p.
Review
For citations:
Temnaya O., Tregubova E. ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT RISKS IN THE RUSSIAN UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE. Vestnik Universiteta. 2018;(10):117-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-10-117-125
Views:
721
Email this article 