THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIO-POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL PROTEST ACTIVITY
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-12-165-170
Abstract
About the Authors
M. A. TaninaRussian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor,
Penza
I. A. Yurasov
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sociological Science, Associate Professor,
Penza
V. A. Yudina
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor,
Penza
O. A. Zyablikova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor,
Penza
References
1. Buranchin A. M. Arkhaizatsiya kak sotsial’naya problema [Archaization as a social problem]. Politicheskoe obrazovanie. Available at: http://lawinrussia.ru/content/arhaizaciya-kak-socialnaya-problema (accessed 04.11.2020).
2. Volodenkov S. V. Internet-kommunikatsii v global’nom prostranstve sovremennogo politicheskogo upravleniya [Internet communications in the global space of modern political governance]. Moscow, Moskovskii universitet, 2015, 272 p.
3. Zubarevich N. V. Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya [Regions of Russia: inequality, crisis, modernization]. Moscow, Nezavisimyi institut sotsial’noi politiki, 2010, 160 p.
4. Ibragimov L. H. Internet kommunikatsii v prostranstve sovremennoi politiki [Internet communications in the space of modern politics]. Vestnik ZaBG, 2016, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 69-82.
5. Kirdina S. G. Institutsional’nye izmeneniya i printsip Kyuri [Institutional changes and the Curie principle]. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii [Economics of Contemporary Russia], 2011, no. 1, pp. 19-38.
6. Kirdina S. G. Institutsional’nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. Vvedenie v X-Y-teoriyu [Institutional matrixes and development of Russia. Introduction to X-Y theory]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 2014, 468 p.
7. Kurennoi V. Sila slabykh svyazei. Gorozhanin i pravo na odinochestvo [The strength of weak connections. Citizen and the right to solitude]. Gorozhanin: chto my znaem o zhitele bol’shogogoroda? [Citizen: what do we know about a resident of a big city]. Мoscow, StrelkaPress, 2017, 216 p.
8. Semenov V. E. Rossiiskaya polimental’nost’i sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya dinamika na pereput’e epoch [Russian polymentality and socio-psychological dynamics at the crossroads of epochs]. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo SPbGU, 2008, 477 p.
9. Semenov V. E. Dukhovno-nravstvennoe preobrazhenie obshchestva v kontekste kontseptsii rossiiskoi polimental’nosti [The spiritual and moral transformation of society in the context of Russian multi-mentality concept]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya nravstvennosti [Psychological studies of morality], Otv. red. A. L. Zhuravlev, A. V. Yurevich. Moscow, Izd-vo IP RAN, 2013, pp. 98-112.
10. Sorokin P. A. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Person. Civilization. Society]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1992, 543 p.
11. Yurasov I. A., Tanina M. A. Sotsial’noe samochuvstvie zhitelei provintsial’nogo goroda [Social well-being of residents of a provincial city]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya [Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology], 2018, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 260-264.
12. Yurasov I. A., Alekhin E. V. Naselenie Penzenskoi oblasti kak factor innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Population of the Penza region as a factor of innovative development]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 2016, no. 2, p. 6.
Review
For citations:
Tanina M.A., Yurasov I.A., Yudina V.A., Zyablikova O.A. THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SOCIO-POLITICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL PROTEST ACTIVITY. Vestnik Universiteta. 2020;(12):165-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-12-165-170