Barriers to managing of intellectual activity results in Russian healthcare organizations and prospects for their overcoming
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-1-149-157
Abstract
The article explores the systemic problems of intellectual property (IP) management within the Russian healthcare sector in the context of technological sovereignty and the digital transformation of the industry. It examines methodological, administrative, and technical barriers that hinder the transformation of scientific developments into protected IP and their subsequent implementation in practice. Special attention has been paid to the lack of a coherent regulatory framework, fragmented infrastructure, and shortages of personnel and financial resources, which reduce the effectiveness of existing mechanisms for protecting and transferring technologies. The study substantiates the need for comprehensive digitalization of the life cycle of IP through a unified platform that ensures transparency of processes, control of deadlines, and integration with scientific reporting systems and regulatory databases. The importance of educational training for researchers in the field of IP and the development of sustainable mechanisms has been emphasized.
About the Author
V. S. Eminova
The Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeria S. Eminova, Postgraduate Student
Moscow
References
1. Gusev, A. V., Vladzimirsky, A. V., Golubev, N. A., & Zarubina, T. V. (2021). Informatization of healthcare in the Russian Federation: history and results of development. National Healthcare, 2(3), 5–17. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.5-17
2. Fedulkin, D. P., & Zinov, V. G. (2018). Normative-legal regulation in the sphere of intellectual property and its relationship with the plans of scientific and technological development of the country. Innovations, 8(238), 13–23. (In Russian).
3. Borovkov, A. I., Afanasyeva, O. V., Dyatlova, D. D., et al. (2024). Experience in intellectual property management at universities. Innovations, 4(300), 3–15. (In Russian).
4. Koteneva, O. E., & Nikolaev, A. S. (2020). Methods of intellectual property management. ITMO University. (In Russian).
5. Wouters, P. (2016). The problem of quantifying productivity in evaluative scientometrics. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.008
6. Dudov, I. A. (2014). Legal regime of inventions created by a grant at the expense of the federal budget. Patents and Licenses. Intellectual Rights, (6), 32–38. (In Russian).
7. Eminova, V. S. (2025). Development intellectual property management system in healthcare. Vestnik Universiteta, (6), 36–44. (In Russian).
8. Kaminsky, A. A., & Ananich, M. I. (2024). Analysis of problems of patenting scientific and technical developments in the field of additive technologies. Interexpo Geo-Siberia, 6, 83–89. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2024-6-83-89
9. Shport, S. V., Trushchelyov, S. A., & Eminova, V. S. (2025). Results of intellectual activity: Creation, registration, implementation: Continuing professional education program. CNTI, LLC. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Eminova V.S. Barriers to managing of intellectual activity results in Russian healthcare organizations and prospects for their overcoming. Vestnik Universiteta. 2026;(1):149-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-1-149-157
Views:
157
JATS XML
Email this article 