The impact of the policy of technological sovereignty on the development of socio-economic development territories
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-1-191-200
Abstract
The article examines the complex impact of the technological sovereignty policy on the development of territories of advanced socio-economic development (hereinafter referred to as TASED). The relevance of the study is determined by the need to find new drivers of regional growth in the context of economic restructuring and sanctions pressure. The work aims to assess the impact of technological sovereignty measures on key indicators of the socio-economic development of the TASEDs. The methodological basis of the study includes comparative analysis, statistical methods, and the analysis of regulatory documents. The research has revealed the dual nature of the impact of this policy. On the one hand, there has been a significant influx of investments into technologically specialized TASEDs, as well as a structural transformation of their economies towards an increase in the share of hightech industries. On the other hand, systemic limitations have been identified, such as continued dependence on imported components, a shortage of qualified engineering and technical personnel, and insufficient coordination between federal and regional development institutions. Based on the analysis, practical recommendations have been formulated for the differentiation of state support measures, the development of educational infrastructure, and the formation of inter-territorial cooperative networks. The results of the study can be used by authorities in adjusting regional and industrial policies, as well as in developing programs for the development of specific TASEDs.
About the Author
N. S. Stepanov
Institute of Economics Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikita S. Stepanov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Lenchuk, E. B. (2025). The role of the state in managing scientific and technological development: from theory to practice. Intellekt. Innovatcii. Investicii, (2), 11–22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2025-2-11
2. Lenchuk, E. B., Akhapkin, N. Y., Dorzhieva, V. V., et al. (2024). Formation of the scientific and technological contour and institutional model for accelerating economic growth in the Russian Federation. (Research report). Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russian).
3. Stepanov, N. S. (2024). Formation of a policy of technological sovereignty in the territories of advanced socio-economic development by attracting private and public capital. Vestnik universiteta, (1), 132–139. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-1-132-139
4. Stepanov, N. S. (2023). Institutes for the new model of economic growth regional management development (territories of advanced development, territories of advanced social and economic development). Vestnik universiteta, (1), 106–113. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-106-113
5. Stepanov, N. S. (2025). Adaptation of the economy of territories of advanced socio-economic development within the framework of technological sovereignty formation. Vestnik universiteta, (2), 144–153. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-144-153
6. Lenchuk, E. B., & Filatov, V. I. (2024). Technological sovereignty projects as a tool for innovative development of the Russian economy. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 17(3), 68–81. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.4
7. Golichenko, O. G. (2006). National innovation system of Russia: state and development paths. Nauka. (In Russian).
8. Ivanova, N. I. (2024). Technological modernization in the modern world economy. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, 17(3), 17–28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2024-17-3-17-28
9. Zhogova, E. V., & Kosobokov, A. Yu. (2021). Regional’naya innovatsionnaya politika v sotsial’noy sfere: teoreticheskiye aspekty i napravleniya [Regional innovation policy in the social sphere: theoretical aspects and directions]. Vestnik Akademii znaniy, 47(6), 150–156. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-6139-2021-6-150-156
10. Voropayeva, D. A. (2021). An analysis of special economic zones and ways to improve their level of development in Russia. International research journal, (12-4), 35–39. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.114.12.123
11. Smorodinskaya, N., & Katukov, D. (2024). A global turn in national industrial strategies: the move towards technological self-sufficiency. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, (12), 5–25. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367624120014
12. Nikonova, A. A. (2023). Milestones for changing the model of scientific-technological development of russia and overcoming the crisis, by academician D. S. Lvov. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 17(2), 289–306. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.2.289-306
13. Serpukhovitin, D. A., Topchy, P. P., & Nazyrova, D. R. (2021). State support instruments for innovative enterprises in the Russian Federation. Ekonomicheskoye razvitiye Rossii, 28(10), 40–48. (In Russian).
14. Lenchuk, E. B., Nikolayev, I. A., Lykova, L. N., et al. (2024). Transformation of the Russian economy in the conditions of forming technological sovereignty. Aleteyya. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Stepanov N.S. The impact of the policy of technological sovereignty on the development of socio-economic development territories. Vestnik Universiteta. 2026;(1):191-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-1-191-200
Views:
138
JATS XML
Email this article 