Analysis of contemporary governance models in higher education in the context of cross-border interaction
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-4-34-42
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to systematize and compare modern models of university management (continental, Anglo-Saxon, and hybrid) in order
to identify the most effective mechanisms for adaptation to the new architecture of international relations. Systematic and institutional approaches, comparative legal, comparative management analyses, statistical summaries evaluation, and analytical reports are used. Elements of sociological analysis and case study are involved.
The research paper shows that hierarchical structures and rigid bilateral agreements are losing their effectiveness, giving way to flexible network consortia and digital ecosystems. It is summarized that the optimal strategy for Russian universities in the current period is the transition to a hybrid management scheme (assuming a combination of state strategic goal-setting (in particular, when turning to the markets of the Global South) with broad operational autonomy of universities in the choice of partnership instruments). The novelty of the research lies in the typologization of management practices based on the latest statistical data, the development of matrix recommendations for networking institutionalization, which will help minimize transaction costs and political risks.
The study can serve as a conceptual basis for adjusting university development strategies. It will be useful for university management staff and specialists at international departments.
About the Author
N. M. KhojiboevaRussian Federation
Nargizakhon M. Khojiboeva, Postgraduate Student
Moscow
References
1. Duran, T. V. (2023). Conceptual foundations of a new model of higher education governance and its implementation by Russian universities. In: Ural Sociological Readings: Personality, culture, society: Legacy of L.N. Kogan and modernity: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Yekaterinburg, March 17–18, 2023. Yekaterinburg. (In Russian).
2. Pavlina, S. Yu. (2021). Education without borders: Erasmus through the eyes of student exchange program participants. Higher Education in Russia, 30(4), 146–156. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-4-146-156
3. Ryabinina, A. M. (2022). Technologies of higher education internationalization in modern conditions. Public Administration. E-Journal, 94, 225–246. (In Russian).
4. Khazanov, S. D., Kotsyurko, E. P. (2024). Modern trends in the management and regulation of higher education systems in selected foreign countries. Modern Law, 10, 12–17. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25799/ni.2024.61.85.002
5. Cherkasov, M. Yu. (2024). International experience in higher education system management and its significance for Russia. Moscow Economic Journal, 9(5), 223–241. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_5_246
6. Gao, M. (2024). A comparative study on the management mode of Chinese and foreign universities in cooperative education. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 2(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v2n1.14
7. Karim, A. M., Chowdhury, T. I., Karim, A. M., & Ahmed, A. R. (2024). The impact of educational management on higher education: International perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i1/20462
Review
For citations:
Khojiboeva N.M. Analysis of contemporary governance models in higher education in the context of cross-border interaction. Vestnik Universiteta. 2026;(4):34-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-4-34-42
JATS XML



































