PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF CULTURAL SPHERE IN RUSSIA: EXPERT VIEW
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-1-163-170
Abstract
As a result of all-Russian expert survey the challenges of cultural management were discussed in order to reveal its weakest points. In the first place, according to the most experts, there is a problem of underfunding, which entails serious consequences such as personnel stagnation, increasing inequality of access to cultural heritage of various strata of the population and regions. In addition, commercialisation of culture lowers its overall level that negatively affects the state of society as a whole. Participants of the survey suggested a range of measures designed to improve the quality of public administration in cultural sector in both law and enforcement aspects. Most experts are convinced that new cultural law which would facilitate an overcoming dramatic inequality is needed.
About the Authors
O. Kryshtanovskaya
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sociological Sciences,
Moscow
A. Komarova
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Sociological Sciences,
Moscow
M. Zakharov
State University of Management
Doctor of Philosophycal Sciences,
Moscow
References
1. Yakobson L. I. Gosudarstvennyi sektor ekonomiki [Government sector of economy]. M.: Izdatel'stvo Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2000. 365 p.
2. Rubinshtein A. Ya. K teorii rynkov opekaemykh blag [On the theory of patronized goods markets]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2011. I. 5, pp. 298–307.
3. Rudnik B. L. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsionno-finansovykh mekhanizmov okazaniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh uslug: rezul'taty ekspertnogo analiza [Improvement of organizational and financial mechanisms for the provision of state and municipal services: results of expert analysis] Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, 2013, I. 3, pp. 70–89.
4. Rudnik B. L. Transformatsiya ekonomicheskikh mekhanizmov v sfere kul'tury: posledovatel'noe razvitie ili dvizhenie po krugu? [Transformation of economic mechanisms in the sphere of culture: consistent development or movement in a circle?]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, 2015, I. 3, pp. 83–102.
5. Toshchenko Zh. T. Travma obshchestva: mezhdu evolyutsiei i revolyutsiei (priglashenie k diskussii) [Trauma of society: between evolution and revolution (invitation to discussion)]. Politicheskie issledovaniya,2017, I. 1, pp. 70–84.
6. Yanitskii O. N. Sotsiologiya kriticheskikh sostoyanii obshchestva: teoreticheskie i metodicheskie problemy [Sociology of critical States of society: theoretical and methodological problems]. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika, 2014, I. 4, pp. 5–24.
Review
For citations:
Kryshtanovskaya O., Komarova A., Zakharov M. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF CULTURAL SPHERE IN RUSSIA: EXPERT VIEW. Vestnik Universiteta. 2019;(1):163-170. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-1-163-170
Views:
733
Email this article 