The role of corporate social responsibility in modern economic theory and activities of multinational enterprises
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-8-155-161
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to consider the place of corporate social responsibility in modern economic theory. The materials devoted to the concept of corporate social responsibility have been analyzed. It has been concluded, that today the arguments in favor of corporate social responsibility are more convincing than the arguments of opponents of this concept. The direction of further priority development of the concept in the direction of greater practical value has been specified and the necessity to strengthen research related to the interdependence of employee motivation and corporate social responsibility has been indicated.
About the Author
E. L. Pavlov
Institute of Africa, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavlov Eduard – Applicant.
Moscow
References
1. Dan'shina, V V, Solov’eva, V V Sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ promyshlennykh predpriyatii v SSSR [Social responsibility of industrial enterprises in the USSR], Vestnik AGTU [Bulletin of the AGTU], 2015, I. 3, pp. 67-74.
2. Zhilina, I. Yu. Stranovye modeli korporativnoi sotsial’noi otvetstvennosti [Country models of corporate social responsibility], Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye problemy Rossii [Economic and Social Problems of Russia], 2016, I. 1, pp. 32-62.
3. Zavyalova, Е. B. Teoreticheskie osnovy socialnoi otvetstvennosti biznesa [Theoretical bases of social responsibility of business], Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Ekonomika [Bulletin of the RUON Series: Economics], 2017, V 25, I. 2, pp. 209-218. DOI 10.22363/2313-2329-2017-25-2-209-218.
4. Igumnov, O. A. Teoreticheskie aspekty genezisa kontseptsii korporativnoi social’noi otvetstvennosti [Theoretical aspects of the Genesis of the concept of corporate social responsibility], Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekono-mika. Informatika [Scientific Statements of the Belgorod State University. Series: Economics, Informatics], 2012, I. 7-1 (126), pp. 74-83.
5. Rutsky, Е. I. Teoreticheskaya baza formirovaniya korporativnoi sotsial’noi otvetstvennosti v Rossii [Theoretical basis for the formation of corporate social responsibility in Russia], Molodoi uchenyi [Young Scientist], 2016, I. 21, pp. 478-485.
6. Sapuncov, A. L. Diversifikatsiya vneshnetorgovykh svyazei stran Afriki s Rossiei [Diversification of foreign trade relations of African countries with Russia], Vestnik universiteta, 2018, I. 12, pp. 111-118.
7. Usanov, P. Nauka o bogatstve [The science of wealth], Saint-Petersburg, Strata, 2017.
8. Ford, G. Moya zhizn’. Moi dostizheniya [My life. My achievement], Moscow, AST, 2017.
9. Chistov, R. S. Filosofsko-kriticheskii analiz osnovnykh konceptsii korporativnoi social’noi otvetstvennosti [Philosophical and critical analysis of the basic concepts of corporate social responsibility], Vestnik KrasGAU [Bulletin of the KrasGAU], 2010, I. 3, pp. 198-203.
10. Engel’s F. Anti-Dyuring. Perevorot v nauke, proizvedennyi gospodinom Evgeniem Dyuringom [The revolution in science, produced by Mr. Eugene During], Moscow, Lenand, 2016.
11. Axelson, E. How the Nordic countries approach CSR and MSI. Stockholm: KTH, 2018.
12. Friedman, M. The social responsibility of business is to enhance its profits, New York Times, 1970, I. 32 (13), pp. 122-126.
13. Hou, M. A., Liu, H. B., Fan, P. C., Wei, Z. A. Does CSR practice pay off in East Asian firms? A meta-analytic investigation, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, I. 33 (1), pp. 195-228.
14. ISO 26000:2010, International Organization for Standardization. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html (accessed 12.06.2019).
15. Kim, C. H., Scullion, H. The effect of corporate social responsibility on employee motivation: A cross-national study, Poznan University of Economics Review, 2013, I. 13(2), pp. 5-30.
16. Levitt, T. The Dangers of Social Responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 1958, I. 36, pp. 41-50.
17. Library Economics Liberty, Henderson on the 2016 Nobel Prize Winners Hart and Holmstrom. Available at: https://www.econlib.org/archives/2016/10/henderson_on_th_8.html (дата обращения: 19.06.2019).
18. Mozes, M., Josman, Z., Yaniv, E. Corporate social responsibility organizational identification and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 2011, I. 7 (2), pp. 310-325.
19. Rethinking the Social Responsibility of Business//Reason.com. Available at: https://reason.com/2005/10/01/rethinking-the-so-cial-responsi-2/ (accessed 23.06.2019).
20. Sternberg, E. Just business: Business ethics in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 11-20.
Review
For citations:
Pavlov E.L. The role of corporate social responsibility in modern economic theory and activities of multinational enterprises. Vestnik Universiteta. 2019;(8):155-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-8-155-161
Views:
604
Email this article 