THE ISSUE OF “CULTURAL AMNESIA” IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-4-182-186
Abstract
The issue of the dual impact of innovative technologies on the sphere of spiritual culture has been considered. On the one hand, the digitalization of cultural values gives hope for their longevity, compared with traditional storage methods. On the other hand, the preservation of cultural heritage is facing new, previously unmet difficulties: the life of digital documents is short due to constant technological improvement and the rapid obsolescence of technology; not all artifacts can be digitized; when knowledge is transmitted through the media, its reduction, vulgarization occurs; finally, the person is changing, for whose sake the preservation of the cultural heritage takes place. Generations possessing clip thinking will have to deal with the fragmented, unsystematic cultural heritage, which is fraught with real cultural amnesia. The new approaches to digital information management and, specifically, digital cultural heritage have been proposed in the article.
About the Authors
M. Yu. Zakharov
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zakharov Mikhail Doctor of Philosophical Sciences
Moscow
I. E. Starovoytova
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Starovoytova Irina Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Moscow
A. V. Shishkova
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shishkova Anastasiya Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Moscow
References
1. Gaponenko A. L. Upravlenie znaniyami [Knowledge management]. Moscow, IPK gossluzhby, 2001. 52 p.
2. Davenport T., Prusak L. Rabochee znanie: Kak organizatsii upravlyayut tem, chto oni znayut [Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2003. 320 p.
3. Janetto K., Willer E. Upravlenie znaniyami. Rukovodstvo po razrabotke i vnedreniyu korporativnoi strategii upravleniya znaniyami. Moscow, Dobraya kniga, 2005. 192 p.
4. Kozharinova A. R. Agenty rasprostraneniya spetsializirovannogo znaniya [Specialized knowledge distribution agents]. Informatsionnyi gumanitarnyi portal “Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie” [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill Journal], 2013. no. 5 (sentyabr'-oktyabr'). Available at: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2013/5/Kozharinova_Application-specific-Knowledge (accessed 10.03.2020).
5. Moiseev N. N. Kontury ratsional'nogo obshchestva [Сontours of a rational society]. Sotsial'no-politicheskii zhurnal, 1993, no. 11-12, pp.71-79.
6. Nonaki I., Takeuchi H. Kompaniya – sozdatel` znaniya: Zarozhdenie i razvitie innovatsii v yaponskikh firmakh. [Company is creator of knowledge: Origin and development of innovations in Japanese firms]. Moscow, Olimp-Biznes Format, 2011. 384 p.
7. Pronina L. A. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v sokhranenii kul'turnogo naslediya [Information technologies in the preservation of cultural heritage]. Analitika kul`turologii, 2008, no. 3 (12), pp. 73-78.
8. Semenovskikh T. V. “Klipovoe myshlenie” – fenomen sovremennosti [“Clip thinking” is a modern phenomenon]. Optimal'nye kommunikatsii: epistemicheskii resurs Akademii mediaindustrii i kafedry teorii i praktiki obshchestvennoi svyaznosti RGGU [Optimal communications: an epistemic resource of The Academy of Media Industry and the Department of Theory and Practice of Public Connectivity of The RSUH]. Available at: http://jarki.ru/wpress/2013/02/18/3208/ (accessed 10.03.2020).
9. YuNESKO ob informatsionnom obshchestve: osnovnye dokumenty i materialy [UNESCO on the information society: main documents and materials]. St. Petersburg, 2004. 120 p.
Review
For citations:
Zakharov M.Yu., Starovoytova I.E., Shishkova A.V. THE ISSUE OF “CULTURAL AMNESIA” IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL CULTURAL HERITAGE MANAGEMENT. Vestnik Universiteta. 2020;(4):182-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-4-182-186
Views:
499
Email this article 