ASSESSMENT OF EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND DEMOTIVATION AS PARAMETERS OF THE “DIGITAL TWIN OF AN ORGANIZATIONʹS MODEL”
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-6-186-190
Abstract
“Digital double” is a rapidly developing technology in recent years. The term “digital double” appeared a long time ago. For more than thirty years, digital doubles, as virtual representatives of real objects, have been used, in particular, in the space sphere. However, this technology became widely known at the time of the beginning of digitalization processes in order to activate the functioning and development of business. The article explores the possibility of using the resource model “Digital twin of an organization” to describe human behavior in specific situations. The probability of choosing an action is determined from a variety of alternatives, based on an assessment of the significance of perceived incentives and restrictions. When predicting human behavior, along with external incentives, internal motives for actions and actions should also be taken into account.
About the Authors
I. A. Rumyantseva
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences,
Moscow
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences,
Moscow
T. Yu. Krotenko
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Moscow
Russian Federation
Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
Moscow
M. B. Zhernakova
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences
Moscow
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences
Moscow
References
1. Vodop'yanova N. E., Starchenkova E. S. Sindrom vygoraniya [Burnout syndrome]. St. Petersburg, Piter, 2008. 258 p.
2. Zhuravleva N. A. Dinamika tsennostnykh orientatsii lichnosti v rossiiskom obshchestve. [Dynamics of value orientations of personality in Russian society]. Moscow, Institut psikhologii RAN, 2006. 335 p.
3. Lozinskaya E. I., Lutova N. B., Vid V. D. Sistemnyi indeks sindroma peregoraniya [System index of burnout syndrome]. St. Petersburg, NIPNI im. Bekhtereva, 2007. 19 p.
4. Mil'man V. E. Motivatsionnyi profil' lichnosti: Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike. Psikhodiagnostika motivatsii i samoregulyatsii [Motivational personality profile: Workshop on psychodiagnostics. Psychodiagnostics of motivation and self-regulation]. Moscow, MGU, 1990. 9 p.
5. Richi Sh., Martin P. Upravlenie motivatsiei: Ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. [Motivation management: Textbook for higher education institutions]. Per. s angl, pod red. E. A. Klimova. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana, 2004. 399 p.
6. Rumyantseva I. A. Antikrizisnye kommunikatsionnye kompetentsii [Anti-crisis communication competencies]. Upravlenie, 2016, no. 4 (4), pp. 99-103.
7. Rumyantsev M. A., Rumyantseva I. A. Ekonomiko-upravlencheskie tekhnologii kak potentsial rosta. [Economic and management technologies as a growth potential]. Upravlenie, 2014, no. 2 (4), pp. 41-45.
8. Sundukova G. M. Innovatsionnyi podkhod k upravleniyu intellektual'nym kapitalom vuza [Innovative approach to managing the University's intellectual capital]. Upravlenie, 2017, no. 5 (1), pp. 80-87.
Review
For citations:
Rumyantseva I.A., Krotenko T.Yu., Zhernakova M.B. ASSESSMENT OF EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND DEMOTIVATION AS PARAMETERS OF THE “DIGITAL TWIN OF AN ORGANIZATIONʹS MODEL”. Vestnik Universiteta. 2020;(6):186-190. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-6-186-190
Views:
672
Email this article 