Ontologization of mental representations for management purposes
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-10-5-9
Abstract
The article considers the problems of ontologization of mental representations of a certain field of activity and the corresponding subject area for the purposes of management automation. For the first time, the authors raise the question about the need to include mental representations of the sphere of activity that the subject area reflects in the ontology of the subject area. Ontologization of mental representations is necessary to identify the participants' understanding of their actions, which will change approaches to management, and for deep training of artificial intelligence in order to transfer part of its management functions to it. On the basis of connectionist approaches to understanding thinking, the paper considers the processes of forming mental representations and changing their attributes. The article gives a new definition and typology of mental representations.
About the Authors
A. R. Akopyan
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Akopyan Anna Candidate of Economic Sciences
Moscow
A. M. Arakelyan
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arakelyan Artur Doctor of Economic Sciences
Moscow
V. V. Krysov
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Krysov Viktor Candidate of Geographical Sciences
Moscow
References
1. Arutyunyan V. Struktura mental'nykh reprezentatsii: izvlechenie teksta iz pamyati, neironnaya set' i iskusstvennyi intellekt [Structure of mental representations: text extraction from memory, neural network and artificial intelligence]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya [Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Filology], 2013, no. 4 (24), pp. 133-139.
2. Kubryakova E. S., Dem`yanov V. Z. K probleme mental'nykh reprezentatsii [To the problem of mental representations]. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 2007, no. 4 (13), pp. 8-16.
3. Loginov N. I., Spiridonov V. F. Voploshchennoe poznanie kak sovremennyi trend razvitiya kognitivnoi psikhologii [Embodied cognition as a modern trend in the development of cognitive psychology]. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 16: Psikhologiya. Pedagogika [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 16: Psikhologiya. Pedagogika], 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25-42.
4. Barsalou L. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2003, no. 18 (5), pp. 513-562.
5. Pitt D. Mental representation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/mental-representation/ (accessed 31.08.2020).
6. Sandberg A. Gf 2045: Anders Sandberg. [Video message]. Available at: https://yandex.ru/video/touch/search?filmld=-12974653496765993043&text=%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%20%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3&noreask=1&path=wizard&ts=1573843519052&source=share (accessed 31.08.2020).
7. Schneider M., Somers M. Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, no. 17 (4), рр. 351-365.
8. Smolensky P. Symbolic functions from neural computation. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2012, vol. 370, no. 1971, рр. 3543-3569.
9. Wearne B. Open the social sciences: The Gulbenkian commission report. The American Sociologist, 1998, no. 29 (3), рр. 71-78.
10. Wilkenfeld D. Understanding as representation manipulability. Synthese, 2011, no.190 (6), рр. 997-1016.
Review
For citations:
Akopyan A.R., Arakelyan A.M., Krysov V.V. Ontologization of mental representations for management purposes. Vestnik Universiteta. 2020;(10):5-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-10-5-9
Views:
495
Email this article 