THE “TECHSUCCESS” RATING AND THE FINANCIAL INDICATORS OF HIGH-TECH BUSINESSES: CORRELATION ANALYSIS
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-11-44-52
Abstract
The authors carry out an analysis of the “TechSuccess” rating and the enterprises’ financial indicators, calculated on the basis of accounting data. The purpose of the paper is to identify the correlations between the stable local ratings of “TechSuccess” and the financial indicators of enterprises. The research method is correlation analysis based on Spearman’s rank correlation. The study has revealed that the local ratings of “TechSuccess”, “Innovative Companies” and “Export Potential” are more stable than the main rating and the rating “Fast-growing Companies”. Enterprises with a higher “Export Potential” rating are characterized by higher growth for the period 2013-2017, as well as lower profitability and financial stability in 2017. Enterprises with a higher innovation rating are characterized by smaller size and more efficient use of assets. The paper describes the remaining identified patterns. The results obtained should be taken into account when developing measures to support high-tech business. In particular, export enterprises have gained advantages during the stagnation period in terms of revenue growth, but lack their own funds for development and are forced to resort to borrowed funds. They need support in this field.
Keywords
correlation analysis,
DEA method,
financial indicators of enterprises,
high-tech business,
export,
industry,
innovations,
Russia,
services,
technical efficiency,
“TechSuccess” rating
Supporting agencies: The study was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Project No. 19-010-00927 “Drivers of development of high-tech foreign trade, industry and service enterprises in Russia in the context of sanctions: economic analysis and econometric modeling”.
About the Authors
A. A. Mikhalchuk
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Physico-Mathematical Sciences
Tomsk
A. V. Hizhnyak
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Student
Tomsk
V. V. Spitsin
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Economic Sciences
Tomsk
E. A. Monastyrnyy
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economic Sciences
Tomsk
References
1. Burdenko E.V. Indeks global’nykh innovatorov kak kharakteristika ispol’zovaniya preimushchestv ekonomiki znanii [The index of global innovators as a characteristic of using the advantages of the knowledge economy]. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative Economy], 2017, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 813-824.
2. Eremchenko O.A. Tekhnologicheski razvitaya kompaniya: metodologicheskie problemy opredeleniya statusa [Technologically advanced company: methodological problems of status determination]. Ekonomika nauki [The Economics of Science], 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30-46.
3. Miller E.V. Issledovanie informatsionnoi otkrytosti tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya rossiiskikh mashinostroitel’nykh predpriyatii (na primere korporativnykh web-saitov) [Research of information openness of technological development of Russian machine-building enterprises (on the example of corporate websites)]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: “Ekonomika” [Herald of Omsk University. Series: “Economics”], 2017, no. 4 (60), pp. 62-70.
4. Monastyrnyi E. A. Reiting “Tekhuspekh” kak instrument analiza protsessov razvitiya uspeshnogo vysokotekhnologichnogo biznesa [Rating “Techuspech” as a tool for analysing the processes of development of a successful high-tech business]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v nauke, upravlenii, sotsial’noi sfere i meditsine: sbornik nauchnykh trudov VI Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. Tomsk, 14-19 oktyabrya 2019 g. [Information technologies in science, management, social sphere and medicine: collection of scientific papers of the VI International conference. Tomsk, October 14-19, 2019]. Tomsk, Izd-vo TPU, 2019, pp. 267-270.
5. Chernyshova G.Yu., Kovalev R.N. Primenenie modeli analiza sredy funktsionirovaniya (data envelopment analysis) dlya otsenki effektivnosti WEB-resursov [Application of the model of the operating environment analysis (data envelopment analysis) to assess the effectiveness of WEB resources]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental research], 2017, no. 8, pp. 453-457.
6. Yusupova A.T., Khalimova S. R. Vysokotekhnologichnyi biznes v regionakh Rossii: rol’ v ekonomike, differentsiatsiya i osnovnye determinanty razvitiya [High-tech business in the regions of Russia: role in the economy, differentiation and the main determinants of development]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment [Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Management], 2020, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 67-96.
7. Yaminskii I.V., Akhmetova A. I. Tsentr perspektivnykh tekhnologii: plany i innovatsii. [Center for advanced technologies: plans and innovations]. Nanoindustriya [Nanoindustry], 2020, vol. 13, no. 1 (94), pp. 54-59.
8. IT-kompaniya SimbirSoft - laureat reitinga “TekhUspekh-2017” [IT-company SimbirSoft is a laureate of the “TechUspekh-2017” rating]. Sluzhba rasprostraneniya press-relizov “Press-reliz.ru” [Press release distribution service “Press-release.ru”]. Available at: http://www.press-release.ru/branches/hitech/327e288c6dd5a/ (accessed 30.08.2020).
9. Vysokotekhnologichnyi eksport opravdyvaet ne te ozhidaniya [High-tech exports meet the wrong expectations]. Kommersant. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3164299 (accessed 30.08.2020).
10. Informatsionnyi resurs SPARK [Information resource SPARK]. Available at: http://www.spark-interfax.ru (accessed 30.08.2020).
11. Natsional’nyi reiting “TekhUspekh” [National rating “TechUspekh”].Available at: http://www.ratingtechup.ru/ (accessed 30.08.2020).
12. Portret rossiiskoi bystrorastushchei tekhnologicheskoi kompanii [A portrait of a Russian fast-growing technology company]. Ekspert online [Expert online], 2016, no. 12. Available at: https://expert.ru/2016/12/10/tehnologicheskie-kompanii/ (accessed 30.08.2020).
13. Alhaddi H. A. An exploratory paper on strategy implementation: Industry look at some of the world’s most profitable and most innovative companies. Journal of Management and Strategy, 2016, no. 7(4). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jms.v7n4p1 (accessed 30.08.2020).
14. Claudia O. Some Insights on the World’s Most Innovative Companies and their Defining Characteristics. Studies in Business and Economics, 2019, no. 14(2), pp. 88–104.
15. Lichtenthaler U. The world’s most innovative companies: a meta-ranking. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2018, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 497-511.
16. Sickles R., Zelenyuk V. Measurement of productivity and efficiency: Theory and practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019. 601 p.
Review
For citations:
Mikhalchuk A.A., Hizhnyak A.V., Spitsin V.V., Monastyrnyy E.A. THE “TECHSUCCESS” RATING AND THE FINANCIAL INDICATORS OF HIGH-TECH BUSINESSES: CORRELATION ANALYSIS. Vestnik Universiteta. 2020;(11):44-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-11-44-52
Views:
507
Email this article 