Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

Vestnik Universiteta

Advanced search

INTERIM MEASURES UNDER PARAGRAPH 10 OF ART. 101 OF THE TAX CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: APPLICATION PRACTICE

https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-2-101-108

Abstract

The purpose of tax audits is to verify that the taxpayer complies with the norms of tax legislation. As a rule, in conditions of instability, constantly changing tax legislation, taxpayers violate the norms of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation. In this regard, as a rule, each tax audit ends with additional charges to the taxpayer of taxes, penalties and penalties, which negatively affect their financial position. At the same time, according to the Federal Tax Service of Russia, with a sharp reduction in the number of ongoing on-site tax audits, the amount of additional charges for one on-site audit increases сonstantly: in 2016 – 13.6 million rubles, in 2017 – 15.7 million rubles, 2018 – 22.2 million rubles, 2019 – 33.5 million rubles. The tax authority, by charging additional taxes and penalties to the taxpayer, is interested in collecting them. The current Tax Code of the Russian Federation makes it possible to enforce the decision by taking measures in accordance with paragraph 10 of Art. 101 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation, the application of which in practice raises many issues. The article considers the practice of applying interim measures. 

About the Author

N. Z. Zotikov
Chuvash State University named after I. N. Ulyanov
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), 

Cheboksary



References

1. Tax Code of the Russian Federation (part one), dated on July 31, 1998 No. 146-FZ (as amended, dated on November 23, 2020), Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_353812/ (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

2. The Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, dated on July 24, 2002 No. 95-FZ (as amended, dated on December 8, 2020), Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_37800/ (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

3. Resolution of the Plenum of the SupremeArbitration Court of the Russian Federation, dated on July 30, 2013 No. 57 “On Some Issues Arising from the Application by Arbitration Courts of Part One of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation”, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_151174/ (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

4. Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, dated on April 24, 2012 No. 16551/11 on case No. А41-36076/10, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=281582#07205772059860538 (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

5. Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, dated on December 25, 2012 No. 10765/12 on case No. A64-6176 / 2011, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=326322#05388379498975298 (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

6. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the North-West District, dated on November 27, 2008 No. A05-4463/2008, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ASZ&n=94522#017828863674160256 (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

7. Resolution of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the North Caucasian District, dated on May 26, 2011 No. A53-22042/2010, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ASK&n=72667#06658721209202529 (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

8. Zaripov V. M. Tax threats to business stability and measures to eliminate them, Proceedings of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2011, no. 1 (11), pp. 208-213. (In Russian).

9. Zotikov N. Z. Directions for improving tax administration, Bulletin for Professional Accountants, 2017, no. 5, pp. 33-42. (In Russian).

10. L`vov Ya. A. Extrajudicial application of interim measures by tax authorities, Nalogovye spory: teoriya i praktika, 2009, no. 4. Available at: https://www.audit-it.ru/articles/account/court/a53/188579.html (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

11. Orlova N. Yu. New approaches to control over the fulfillment of the obligation to pay taxes and fees, Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2019, no. 7 (59), pp. 98-103. (In Russian).

12. Pantyushov O. V. Suspension of operations on the taxpayer’s current account, Vestnik Arbitrazhnoy Praktiki, 2015, no. 4 (59), pp. 9-17. (In Russian).

13. Serebryakova V. S. Problems of legal regulation of suspension of transactions on taxpayers’ accounts with banks, Modern Jurisprudence: Current Issues, Achievements and Innovations: Collection of Articles of the XIX International Scientific and Practical Conference, Penza, April 25, 2019, responsible editor G. Yu. Gulyaev, Penza, Nauka i Prosveshchenie 2019, pp. 96- 98. (In Russian).

14. Sokol R. V. Suspension of operations on bank accounts as a way to ensure the fulfillment of tax obligations, Domestic jurisprudence, 2016, no. 36 (8), pp. 82-86. (In Russian).

15. Smorodina A. E. Interim measures: how tax authorities are insured against non-payment of additionally charged amounts, Glavnaya kniga: zhurnal gotovykh reshenii dlya bukhgaltera, 2013, no. 12. Available at: https://glavkniga.ru/elver/2013/12/1087obespechitelinie_meri_nalogoviki_podstrakhovivautsja_neuplati_donachis (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

16. Kuznetsova T. VS will check the legality of the interim measures of the Federal Tax Service, justified by bringing the company to responsibility, Advokatskaya gazeta. Available at: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/vs-proverit-zakonnost-obespechitelnykh-mer-fns-obosnovannykh-privlecheniem-kompanii-k-otvetstvennost/ (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

17. Makarov D. Interim measures: legality of application, Predprinimatel`stvo i pravo: informatsionno-analiticheskii portal. Available at: http://lexandbusiness.ru/view-article.php?id=951 (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

18. Tax analytics, Federal Tax Service of Russia: official website. Available at: https://analytic.nalog.ru/portal/index.ru-RU.htm (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

19. Khochuev V. V. Application of interim measures in the tax sphere, Federal Tax Service of Russia: official website. Available at: https://www.nalog.ru/rn07/news/tax_doc_news/4319751/ (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).

20. Shestakova E. Interim measures based on the results of a tax audit, Nalogi i pravo: povyshenie yuridicheskikh znanii. Available at: https://lawedication.com/blog/2013/12/16/obespechitelnye-mery-po-rezultatam-nalogovoj-proverki/ (accessed 26.12.2020). (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Zotikov N.Z. INTERIM MEASURES UNDER PARAGRAPH 10 OF ART. 101 OF THE TAX CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: APPLICATION PRACTICE. Vestnik Universiteta. 2021;(2):101-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-2-101-108

Views: 1028


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-4277 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8415 (Online)