Typology of digital organizations in the context of digital transformation

The article aims at a conceptual explanation of the components of digital transformation, including such concepts as “digital organization”, “digitization”, “digitalization”, and “digital “destruction”. The reviews of research in the field of digital transformation have shown that there are different explicit definitions of concepts and they are quite heterogeneous. This made it possible to develop definitions of the relevant concepts, resulting in two different conceptual clusters: arbitrary and involuntary concepts. The first cluster covers concepts grouped around the result of a digital organization. The second cluster refers to violations that give rise to a marginal organization. Based on the review of research on digitalization the author presented a typology of digital organizations, which includes four types: analog organization, digital organization of the first, second and third types. The developed typology is a classic version of the typology: two types with minimum and maximum digitalization, which correspond to the end points of this combination. Between them are two more types with a consistently increasing intensity of digitization. It is obvious that the digitalization of organizations begins with the second type, which is characterized by the rapid application of digital technologies and gradually increases to the fourth type, which represents the strategic integration of digital technologies.

1. Groshev I. V., Minin He Projecting a digital organization, Vestnik of Economic Security, 2020, no. 1, pp. 250-255. (In Russian).

2. Zheregelya A. V. Features of interaction in companies in the conditions of digitalization, Vestnik universiteta, 2019, no. 7, pp. 108-112. (In Russian).

3. Baiyere A., Salmela H. Disruptive innovation & information technology - charting apath, Proceedings of the 24-th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 4-6 December 2013, pp. 1-11.

4. Bajer J. Editorial: digital transformation of HR, Strategic HR Review, 2017, no. 16 (2), pp. 53-54.

5. Bharadwaj A., El Sawy O., Pavlou P. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights, MIS Quarterly, 2013, no. 37 (2), pp. 471-482.

6. Brennen S., Kreiss D., Digitalization and digitization, Culture Digitally, 2014, 8 September.

7. Chan Y., Reich B. IT alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 2007, no. 22 (4), pp. 297-315.

8. Coltman T., Tallon P., Sharma R. Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on, Journal of Information Technology, 2015, no. 30 (2), pp. 91-100.

9. Doty D., Glick W. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling, The Academy of Management Review, 1994, no. 19 (2), pp. 230-251.

10. Hanelt A., Bohnsack R., Marz D. Same, same, but different!? A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation, 78-th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL, 2018, pp. 10-14.

11. Henderson J., Venkatraman N. Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, IBM Systems Journal, 1993, no. 38 (1), pp. 472-484.

12. Ismail M.H., Khater M., Zaki M. Digital business transformation and strategy: what do we know so far? Working Paper, University of Cambridge. Cambridge, November, 2017, 301 р.

13. Larkin J. HR digital disruption: the biggest wave of transformation in decades, Strategic HR Review, 2017, no. 16 (2), pp. 55-59.

14. Martini M., Cavenago D. E-HRM configurations: an explorative analysis of types, drivers and outcomes of digital HRM, Academy of Management Global Proceedings, 2018, 278 р.

15. Morakanyane R., Grace A.A., O'Reilly P. Conceptualizing digital transformation in business organizations: a systematic review of literature, 30-th Blede Conference on Digital Transformation - From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives, Bled, Slovenia, 2017, pp. 18-21.

16. M0ller L., Gertsen F., Johansen S. Characterizing digital disruption in the general theory of disruptive innovation, ISPIM Conference Proceedings, Vienna, Austria, 2017, pp. 18-21.

17. Sebastian I., Ross J., Beath C. How big old companies navigate digital transformation, MIS Quarterly Executive, 2017, no. 16 (3), pp. 197-213.

18. Thite M. Electronic/digital HRM: a primer, Thite M. (ed.) e-HRM: Digital Approaches, Directions & Applications, New York, Routledge, 2019, pp. 1-21.

19. Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, no. 28 (2), pp. 118-144.

20. Weber M. “Objectivity“ of social knowledge and social politics [Die «Objektivitat» sozial wissens chaft licher und sozial politis cher Erkenntnis], Archivfur Sozial Wissenschaft undSozialPolitik, 2004, no. 19 (1), pp. 22-87. (In German).