Individualisation of cities as one of the factors of preserving human capital
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-12-40-46
Abstract
This study examines the problem of individualisation, individualisation of cities and its relationship with human capital. The strategies of Russian cities put human capital in one of the key positions, but the use of outdated methods of attracting the population has practically exhausted itself. In this regard, the authors put forward a hypothesis about a close connection between the individualisation of urban strategies and the preservation of human capital. Foreign approaches to the individualisation of cities have been considered. A mechanism for implementing individualised strategies of Russian cities by creating a city brand has been proposed as well as the key points of this process have been highlighted. The characteristic features of the formation of the brand of territories for different types of cities have been determined. It has been concluded that the manifestation of their individuality will help Russian cities in preserving human capital, as well as in attracting resources for their development.
About the Authors
E. A. ZakharchukRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.),
Ekaterinburg
V. E. Uporov
Russian Federation
Economist,
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Law of the Kemerovo Region of December 26, 2018, No. 122-OZ (as amended of December 23, 2020) “On Approval of the Strategy for the Socio-Economic Development of the Kemerovo Region – Kuzbass for the Period until 2035” (adopted by the Council of People’s Deputies of the Kemerovo Region on December 21, 2018), Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/regbase/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=RLAW284&n=94009#YmD55rSee8W8m3OM2 (accessed 05.09.2021).
2. Resolution of the Government of the Kaluga Region of June 29, 2009, No. 250 (as amended of November 26, 2020) “On the Strategy of Social and Economic Development of the Kaluga Region until 2030”, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/regbase/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=RLAW037&n=30274&dst=100001#maIF5rSSJKuLarv71 (accessed 06.09.2021).
3. Order of the Head of the Republic of Adygea of December 11, 2014, No. 254-rg (as amended of August 2, 2018) “On the Investment Strategy of the Republic of Adygea until 2025”, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/regbase/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=RLAW977&n=40810#jNIG5rSC8SbpFPTo (accessed 06.09.2021).
4. Resolution of the Administration of Veliky Novgorod of July 22, 2021, No. 4003 “On the Approval of the Territorial Brand of Veliky Novgorod”, Legal reference system “ConsultantPlus”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/regbase/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=RLAW154&n=95756#tNZG5rSAJQMb2WWp1 (accessed 06.09.2021).
5. Arno A. V. Individualisation of personal consumption as a factor in building long-term relations between participants in the distribution channel: monograph, ed. by N. A. Platonov, A. P. Chelenkov, Yaroslavl, Kantsler, 2016, 179 p. (In Russian).
6. Bochko V. S., Zakharchuk E. A. Individualisation of city development strategies: case Ekaterinburg and Birmingham, Economy of Regions, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 391–405. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-2-5
7. Bochko VS, Zakharchuk EA Methodology for formation of “the image of the future” in strategic planning, Russian Journal of Economic Theory, 2019, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 688–704. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.7.
8. Vizgalov D.V. Marketing of the city: practical manual, Moscow,The Institute for Urban Economics Foundation, 2008, 110 p.(InRussian).
9. Zhikharevich B. S., Pribyshin T. K. Urban development strategies: Russian practice 2014 – 2019, Spatial Economics, 2019, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 184–204. (In Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.184-204
10. Iskanderova K. I., Nikitin A. A. City brand as the basis for strategic planning of territorial development, Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii, 2017, vol. 4–1, no. 7, pp. 125–130. (In Russian).
11. Kuzmichev S. M. Topical issues of understanding human capital and its role in modern economic processes, Molodoi uchenyi, 2017, no. 28 (162), pp. 63–64. (In Russian).
12. Kotler Ph., Asplund Ch., Rein I., Haider D. Marketing places Europe: How to attract investments, industries, residents and visitors to cities, communes, regions and nations in Europe, transl. from Engl. by M. Akkaya with the participation of V. Mishuchkov, ed. by G. Ivashevskaya, St. Petersburg, Stockholm School of Economics, 2005, 376 p. (In Russian).
13. Pankrukhin A. P. Marketing of territories, 2nd ed., St. Petersburg, Piter, 2006, 411 р. (In Russian).
14. Prahalad C. K., Ramaswami V. The future of competition. Co-creating unique value with consumers, transl. from Engl. by G. Sakhatskii, Moscow, Olymp-Business, 2006, 337 p. (In Russian).
15. Trifonova P. S. The main strategic documents of the Russian Federation’s subjects: analysis, actualization, individualization, Vestnik universiteta, 2021, no. 6, pp. 31–43. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-6-31-43
16. Yasko S. E., Kuznetsova L. A. Necessity of formation and promotion of the city brand, Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, vol. 3, no. 3 (257), pp. 140–142. (In Russian).
17. Boorstin D. J. The Americans: The democratic experience, New York, Random House, 1973, 736 р.
18. Freeman E. R. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010, 276 р. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675
19. Glińska E., Kilon J. Desirable traits of the city brand personality in the opinion of managers for the promotion of the city Government in Poland, Procedia – Social Behavioral and Sciences, 2014, vol. 156, pp. 418–423. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.sbspro.2014.11.214
20. Gorbaniuk O. Brand personification: psychological and marketing perspectives [Personifikacja marki: perspektywa psychologiczna i marketingowa], Lublin, Wydawnictwo KUL, 2011, 481 р. (In Polish).
21. Ma, W., De Jong, W. M., Hoppe T., De Bruijne, M. From city promotion via city marketing to city branding: Examining urban strategies in 23 Chinese cities, Cities, 2021, vol. 116, art. 103269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103269
22. Papp-Vary A. The Anholt-GMI city brand Hexagon and the Saffron European city brand barometer: a comparative study, Regional and Business Studies, 2011, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 555–562.
Review
For citations:
Zakharchuk E.A., Uporov V.E. Individualisation of cities as one of the factors of preserving human capital. Vestnik Universiteta. 2021;(12):40-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-12-40-46