Assessment of social industrial management
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-5-37-43
Abstract
The article defines the criteria for the effectiveness of social management of an industrial enterprise. Some methodological approaches used in evaluating the effectiveness of social management are considered. The authors propose a methodology for determining the effectiveness of social management of an enterprise, which is based on the use of certain conditional calculated indicators and can be applied in the conditions of digitalization of the economy, and also involves implementation in several stages. The effectiveness of social management, according to the authors, must be assessed based on the results of the implementation of the social development plan developed for each enterprise. The authors recommend taking this approach to assessing the effectiveness of social management as one of the examples of the search for specific ways to create objective prerequisites and a methodological basis for studying a systematic approach to organizing work.
About the Author
S. V. SharokhinaRussian Federation
Svetlana Sharokhina, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof. at the Economics and Management Department
Syzran
References
1. Purlik V.M. Efficiency and efficiency of the company: difficulties in reaching a compromise. Public administration. Electronic bulletin. 2017;(60):261–280.
2. Zheronkin R.S. Definition of the concept of management efficiency. E-Scio. 2019;(34):372–378.
3. Kochetkov V.V., Ratushnyak, E.S. Indicators for assessing the effectiveness of management. Management of economic systems: electronic scientific journal. 2017;(97):19.
4. Angelovski A., Brandts H., Sola C. Equal and Unequal Profit Sharing in Highly Interdependent Work Groups: A Laboratory Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2021;184:232–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.01.024
5. Zhang H., Veltree E., Haapala Karl R. The Business Case for Sustainable Manufacturing in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: A Systems Approach to Decision Making. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;287:125038. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125038
6. Monostori Y. Beyond profit motivation: environmentally conscious (re)design of supply chain structures. Procedia CIRP. 2020;93:808–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.033
7. Son J.H., Kim J.H., Kim G.J. Does employee satisfaction influence customer satisfaction? Assessing coffee shops through the service profit chain model. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2021; 94:102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102866
8. Färe R., Zelenyuk V. Profit efficiency: Generalization, business accounting and the role of convexity. Economics Letters. 2020;196:109483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109483
9. Bulygin Yu.E. Organization of social management. Moscow: Kontur; 1999. (In Russian).
10. Klimenko O.I., Ponkratov I.N. System analytical activity of the enterprise: theoretical and organizational and technological foundations: monograph. Belgorod: BUKEP Publishing House; 2010. (In Russian).
11. Meng Q., Zhou Y. Enterprise economic performance evaluation based on 5G network and embedded processing system. Microprocessors and Microsystems. 2020;80:103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103603
12. Bulov A.A., Kislova T.A. Management theory: textbook. St. Petersbourg: Science-intensive technologies; 2019. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Sharokhina S.V. Assessment of social industrial management. Vestnik Universiteta. 2022;(5):37-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-5-37-43