Unilateral coercive measures in the doctrine of modern international law

The main purpose of this article was to study the theoretical foundations of the application of unilateral coercive measures by states. It was determined that these measures are not consistent with all the fundamental international legal principles. The author indicates that such measures have a wide range of actions and can be both economic and non-economic by nature. The terminological problem of the concept of “unilateral coercive measures” is considered. These measures are often mistakenly referred to as “sanctions”, thereby identifying them with unquestionably legitimate measures taken by the United Nations Security Council. In the legislation of the Russian Federation, unlike other states, there was no confusion of concepts. The article notes that the issue of the legality of the use of unilateral coercive measures is relevant. The fact is that these measures, among other things, can negatively affect the lives of innocent citizens. The most vulnerable segments of society are particularly affected by this, for example, due to the denial of access to essential goods. For this reason, unilateral coercive measures taken by a state should not create any serious violations of people’s fundamental rights. In addition, due to their specific nature, unilateral coercive measures affect the economic processes of states.

1. United Nations. UN General Assembly Resolution «Human rights and unilateral coercive measures» A/RES/51/103 dated 3 March 1997. https://www.un.org/ru/ga/51/docs/51res.shtml (accessed 10.03.2022).

2. United Nations. Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States (General Assembly resolution 3281 (XXIX), New York dated 12 December 1974). https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/rights_and_duties.shtml (accessed 10.03.2022).

3. Dovhan E.F. Mechanisms for the protection of human rights the event of the introduction of unilateral forced measures in the activities of the special mechanisms of the UN Council on human rights. Pravo.by. 2017;5(49):124–131.

4. United Nations. Thematic study of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, including recommendations on actions aimed at ending such measures dated 11 January 2012 No. A/HRC/19/33. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session19/A-HRC-19-33_ru.pdf (accessed 10.03.2022).

5. United Nations. Charter of the United Nations (signed in San Francisco on June 26, 1945). https://www.un.org/ru/about-us/un-charter/full-text (accessed 10.03.2022).

6. Mikheev Yu.Ya. Application of coercive measures under the UN Charter. Moscow: International relations; 1967. (In Russian).

7. United States Congress. Countering America’s Adversaries through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3364/text (accessed 10.03.2022).

8. Kritskiy K.V. International sanctions and unilateral restrictive measures: Problems of definition. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2016;2(102):204–213.

9. Keshner M.V. UN economic sanctions: Trends in the development of implementation forms. International Law and International Organizations. 2015;2:139–146. https://doi.org/10.7256/2226-6305.2015.2.14611

10. Ganshina N.I., Sergeeva I.A. Economic sanctions as a threat economic security of Russia. Proceedings of conferences of the Sociosphere Scientific and Publishing Center. 2020;24:197–200.

11. Russian Federation. Federal Law No. 281-FZ dated 30 December 2006 “On special economic measures and coercive measures”. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_64883/ (accessed 10.03.2022).

12. Russian Federation. Federal Law No. 127-FZ dated 04 June 2018 “On measures of influence (counteraction) on unfriendly actions of the United States of America and other foreign states”. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_299382/ (accessed 10.03.2022).

13. Jazairy I. Unilateral economic sanctions, international law, and human rights. Ethics & International Affairs. 2019;33(3):291–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0892679419000339

14. Ashley L. Unilateral Coercive Measures: Towards International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights. In: Subedi Surya P. (ed.) Unilateral Sanctions in International Law. London, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing; 2021.

15. United Nations. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, Idriss Jazairy dated 10 August 2015 No. А/HRC/30/45. https://www.refworld.org.ru/pdfid/565ff2fe4.pdf (accessed 10.03.2022).

16. Russian Federation. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 30 November 2016 No. 640 “On approval of the Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation”. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_207990/ (accessed 10.03.2022).