Current issues of digitalisation of social and economic systems
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-7-54-59
Abstract
The object of the research is the issues of digital transformation, which must be taken into account in the national policy of the Russian Federation for the successful implementation of ambitious national goals of technological development of society and the state. The article analyzes the experience of foreign countries in topical issues (digital agenda; digital government; digital divide), which are defined as an integral part of digitalisation and have mutual influence. The author came to the conclusion that in the digital agenda, only comprehensive measures to improve citizens’ living standards can become effective tools for solving the problem of public resistance to technological development. The successful functioning of digital government is based on nine components of evolutionary development, where the final stage should be the digital ecosystem of the state. The digital divide, which significantly affects the stability of socio-economic systems, is the most difficult issue to focus on when developing roadmaps for technological improvement.
About the Author
N. S. Kozyr
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Kozyr - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof. at the Economic Security Department
Krasnodar
References
1. Verhoef P.C., Broekhuizen T., Bartb Ya., Bhattacharya A., Qi Dong J., Fabian N., Haenleinc M. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 2021;122:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.09.022
2. Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2019;28(2):118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSIS.2019.01.003
3. Scholl H.J. The Digital Government Reference Library (DGRL) and its potential formative impact on Digital Government Research (DGR). Government Information Quarterly. 2021;38(4):101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101613
4. Puron-Cid G., Luna E.D., Picazo-Vela S., Gil-Garcia J.R., Sandoval-Almazan R., Luna-Reyes L.F. Improving the assessment of digital services in government websites: Evidence from the Mexican State government portals ranking. Government Information Quarterly. 2021;39(11):101589. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101589
5. Pittaway J.J., Montazemi A.R. Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly. 2020;37(4):101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2020.101474
6. Pérez-Morote R., Pontones-Rosa C., Núñez-Chicharro M. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;154:119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2020.119973
7. Tangi L., Janssen M., Benedetti M., Noci G. Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management. 2021;60(1):102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2021.102356
8. Matheus R., Janssen M., Janowski T. Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly. 2021;38(1):101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2020.101550
9. Newman J., Mintrom M., O’Neill D. Digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and bureaucratic transformation. Futures. 2022;136:102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUTURES.2021.102886
10. World Bank. Digital Government Readiness Assessment (DGRA): Toolkit V.31 Guidelines for Task Teams. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/999901588145595011/Digital-Government-Readiness-Assessment-DGRA-Toolkit-V-31-Guidelinesfor-Task-Teams (accessed 03.04.2022).
11. Rajam V., Reddy A.B., Banerjee S. Explaining caste-based digital divide in India. Telemat. Informatics. 2021;65:101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2021.101719
12. Zhao L., Caoa C., Li Yu., Li Yu. Determinants of the digital outcome divide in E-learning between rural and urban students: Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic based on capital theory. Computers in Human Behavior. 2022;130:107177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.107177
13. Mignamissi D., Djijo T.A.J. Digital divide and financial development in Africa. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(9):102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102199
14. Mendoza-Lozano F.A., Quintero-Peña J.W., García-Rodríguez J.F. The digital divide between high school students in Colombia. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(10):102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102226
15. Jamil S. From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(8):102206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102206
16. Pontones-Rosa C., Pérez-Morote R., Santos-Peñalver J.F. ICT-based public policies and depopulation in hollowed-out Spain: A survey analysis on the digital divide and citizen satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;169:120811.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2021.120811
17. Randolph Beard T., Ford G.S., Stern M. Bridging the Digital Divide: An empirical analysis of public programs to increase broadband adoption. Telematics and Informatics. 2022;67:101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2021.101754
18. Grishchenko N. The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia. Telecommunications Policy. 2020;44(8):102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.102004
19. Wang D., Zhou T., Lan F., Wang M. ICT and socio-economic development: Evidence from a spatial panel data analysis in China. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(7):102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELPOL.2021.102173
20. Certomà C. Future scenarios of Digital Social Innovation in urban governance. A collective discussion on the socio-political implications in Ghent. Cities. 2022;122:103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CITIES.2021.103542
Review
For citations:
Kozyr N.S. Current issues of digitalisation of social and economic systems. Vestnik Universiteta. 2022;1(7):54-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-7-54-59
Views:
413
Email this article 