State regulation as a factor of social significance of China’s modern culture industry
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-8-196-202
Abstract
The article is based on the study of state-party normative documents, such as the National Cultural Development Plan, The Cultural Industries Reinvigoration Plan, the National Economic and Social Development Plans China’s National Economic and Social Development Plans for the Twelfth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth FiveYear Plan periods. The focus on cultural projects is understood as an instrument of China’s soft power in its foreign policy course. In addition, national projects of educational and cultural nature are given the importance of state branding in the system of global reforms undertaken in the country. The article considers such reasons for the authorities to address cultural issues as the inadequate system of services provided in the field of education and culture; the predominance of small-scale commodity production in the cultural industry. The lack of professionalism of the management of the cultural institutions has negative consequences for the cultural ecology. The tasks of state regulation are: improvement of general cultural characteristics of the population and society as a whole, economic growth, preservation of the environment, increase of material level of the population.
About the Author
L. V. Filindash
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof. at the Philosophy Department,
Moscow
References
1. Galeeva A.A. China: Plans for a new Cultural Revolution. Kul’tura v sovremennom mire. 2013;(2):3.
2. Tarasova E.I., Naidenko A.V. Features of China’s modern cultural policy: main directions and development trends. Herald of the MGLU. Humanities. 2021;(7):242–254.
3. Tugusheva N.V. The position of the CPC of the People’s Republic of China on the reform of the cultural sphere (the end of the XX–XXI century). Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2012;(14):106–108.
4. Nurieva L.F., Ibragimova D.R. Censorship and ways to circumvent it in the modern press. Modern Oriental studies. 2019;(2):12–16.
5. Didenko V.D., Nurakhmet D., Paudyal N.Yu., Filindash L.V. Manifestation of China’s mental features in intercultural communication. Modern communication studies. Scientific research and development. 2020;9(3):23–28.
6. Zakharov M.Yu. The social ideal of “Datong”: ancient China social utopia, or modern foresight project. Vestnik universiteta. 2022;(1):164–168. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-1-164-168
7. Liang Ch. China’s cultural diplomacy in Central Asia in the XXI century on the example of Confucius institutes. Journal of the Asia-Pacific Region: Economics, Politics, Law. 2017;(1):33–45.
8. Paudyal N.Yu. Dissipativity of communication in the system of mass culture. Vestnik universiteta. 2016;(5):240–247.
9. Didenko V.D., Filindash L.V., Nur-Akhmet D. Management Culture and National Mental Attitudes in the Digital Era. In: Popkova E.G., Ostrovskaya V.N., Bogoviz A.V. (eds.) Socio-economic Systems: Paradigms for the Future. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 314. Cham: Springer; 2021. P. 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_91
10. The official portal of the Moscow Mayor and Moscow Government. The old manor house in TiNAO was restored in a year. https://www.mos.ru/news/item/13502073/ (accessed 04.07.2022).
11. The 13-th Five-year Development Plan (On State administration). http://russian.china.org.cn/china/China_Key_Words/201812/04/content_74237957.htm (accessed 04.07.2022).
12. Chi Zao. The 14th Five-year plan: Institutional advantages portend a promising future for the implementation of China’s centennial goal. People’s Daily Online. 26 Oct. 2020. http://russian.people.com.cn/n3/2020/1026/c95181-9773022.html (accessed 04.07.2022).
Review
For citations:
Filindash L.V. State regulation as a factor of social significance of China’s modern culture industry. Vestnik Universiteta. 2022;(8):196-202. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-8-196-202
Views:
305
Email this article 