Ensuring homogeneity of regional socio-economic development: Republic of Bashkortostan case study
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-100-105
Abstract
Over the past several years, an increase in regions’ heterogeneity determined by the uneven distribution of resources, lack of effective levers of innovation management, and the growing shortage of financial resources has become one of the main features of regions’ socio-economic development. That has led to their disintegration into territories that are quite different in terms of socio-economic development. The need for the use of levers of economic regulation is specific to each territory, which means that management systems react to corresponding signals quite differently. In the article, the homogeneity of the socio-economic system, its basic element being the region, is dealt with based on the connectivity of the economy. The capacity of the flows of goods and services, development of the corresponding infrastructure, optimality of population settlement, and reasonableness of financial resources redistribution, which implies the effectiveness of their use in order to stimulate economic activities and ensure innovation, are taken into account.
About the Authors
R. F. GataullinRussian Federation
Rinat F. Gataullin, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Sector
Economics and Territorial Development Management Sector
Ufa
E. R. Chuvashaeva
Russian Federation
Elvira R. Chuvashaeva, Researcher
Economics and Territorial Development Management Sector
Ufa
References
1. Dubrovskaya Yu. V., Akhmetova M. I. Interaction of innovative infrastructure subjects as a factor of divergence management on the level of regional socio-economic systems. Journal of economy and entrepreneurship. 2015; 63-2: 290–295.
2. Bochko V. G. Integrative strategic development of territories: theory and methodology. Yekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2010. (In Russian).
3. Kutsenko E. How are things going with innovations in the Russian regions? Business journal. 2014; 9.
4. Animitsa E. G. Spatial organization of society: problem statement and conceptual guidelines. Journal of new economy. 2007; 19: 82–85
5. Mikheeva M. N. Structural factors of regional dynamics: Measuring and assessment. Spatial economics. 2013; 1: 11–32. doi: 10.14530/se.2013.1.011-032
6. Dubrovskaya Yu. V. Interregional cooperation as a tool for managing differentiation of regional socio-economic systems: the cluster approach. Perm University Herald. Economy. 2016; 31: 117-125. doi: 10.17072/1994-9960-2016-4-117-126
7. Gataullin R. F. (gen. ed.) Leveling the spatial polarization of the socio-economic development of multi-level territorial systems. Ufa: ISER UFRC RAS; 2019. (In Russian).
8. Bodrunov S. D. Revival of production, science and education: problems and solutions. Problems of modern economics. 2014; 4: 35–41.
9. Gataullin R. F. (gen. ed.) Transformation of the socio-economic space of the region: methodology and practice. Ufa: ISER UFRC RAS; 2020. (In Russian).
10. Gataullin R. F. (gen. ed.) Structurization of the economic space of the region: essence, factors, design: monograph. Ufa: ISER UFRC RAS; 2016. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Gataullin R.F., Chuvashaeva E.R. Ensuring homogeneity of regional socio-economic development: Republic of Bashkortostan case study. Vestnik Universiteta. 2023;1(1):100-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-100-105