Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

Vestnik Universiteta

Advanced search

The methodology genesis of system-dynamic modeling and the prospects of its application to solve the corporate change management’s digitalization problems

https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-7-71-80

Abstract

The paper presents identification of the main directions and conceptual approaches of methodological support for corporate change management digitalization and improvement of organizations. Within the framework of the study, the prospects of applying the methodology of system-dynamic simulation modeling in the conditions of digital transformation of the economy and management are analyzed. The issues of mastering the areas of growth of the organization and carrying out economically justified transformations, implemented including through the investment management strategy, are investigated within the framework of system-dynamic modeling of economic systems proposed by J. Forrester. The use of such modeling has been carried out to improve organizational forms and increase the efficiency of organizations’ management. The article discusses the current problems and key tasks of digitalization of corporate governance using a systematic approach. The tendencies of improving the methodology of system-dynamic simulation modeling are investigated. The development scheme of the system-dynamic modeling’s stages presented in the classical literature on system dynamics is given. Variants of methodology development based on the synthesis of classical approaches with advanced corporate governance practices and current works of foreign, Russian researchers are proposed. Ultimately the synthesis proposed in the paper will make it possible to create models based on the synthesis of methodologies, and most effectively master the growth’s areas of organizations, as well as to carry out economically justified transformations implemented, including through an investment management strategy.

About the Author

D. A. Sokolov
State University of Management
Russian Federation

Dmitriy A. Sokolov - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Lecturer at the Department of Mathematical Methods in Economics and Management, Junior researcher,

Moscow



References

1. Lopatnikov L.I. Popular Economic and Mathematical Dictionary. Moscow: Znanie; 1990 (In Russian).

2. Forrester Jay W. Industrial Dynamics. Trans. from Eng. Gvishiani D.M. Moscow: Progress; 1971 (In Russian).

3. Bertalanffy L. General System Theory. Review of Problems and Results. In: Systems research. Moscow: Nauka; 1969; 30–45 pp. (In Russian).

4. Nikanorov S.P. System Analysis: A Stage in the Development of Problem-solving Methodology in the USA. In: Systems Analysis for Business Management. Moscow: Sovetskoye radio; 1969;3–14 pp. (In Russian).

5. Sadovsky V.N. Foundations of the General Systems Theory. Moscow: Nauka; 1974 (In Russian).

6. Fritjof C., Luisi P.L. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. 510 p.

7. Forrester Jay W. Urban Dynamics. Trans. from Eng. Orlova M.G. Moscow: Progress; 1974 (In Russian).

8. Barabasi A.-L., Frangos J. Linked: The New Science of Networks. New York: Perseus Books Group; 2002. 288 p.

9. Senge P.M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. Trans. from Eng. Pinsker B.S. Moscow: Olimp-Business; 2003 (In Russian).

10. O’Connor J., McDermott I., The Art of Systems Thinking. Trans. from Eng. Pinsker B.S. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2014. (In Russian).

11. Meadows D. Thinking in Systems. Trans. from Eng. Romanovsky D. Moscow: MIF; 2018 (In Russian).

12. Sterman J. Business Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000. 1008 p.

13. Cavana R.Y., Mares E.D. Integrating Critical Thinking and Systems Thinking: From Premises to Causal Loops. System Dynamics Review. 2004; 20(3): 223–235.

14. Luna-Reyes, L.F., Andersen, D.L. Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data for System Dynamics: Methods and Models. System Dynamics Review. 2003; 19(4): 271–296.

15. Katalevsky D.Y. Fundamentals of Simulation Modeling and System Analysis in Management. Moscow: “Delo”, RANEPA; 2015 (In Russian).

16. Schoenberg W., Davidsen P., Eberlein R. Understanding model behavior using loops that matter. System Dynamics Review. 2020; 36:158–190.

17. Elias A.A. Environmental Conflicts, Stakeholders and a Shared Mental Model. ResearchGate. 2023. 15 p.

18. Elias A.A., Cavana R.Y. Stakeholder Analysis for Systems Thinking and Modelling. ResearchGate. 2011.

19. Goldratt E. The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. Trans. from Eng. Fedurko E. Minsk: Popurry; 2012 (In Russian).

20. Scheer A.-W. From Disruptive Business Model to Automation of Business Processes. Trans. from Eng. Vinichenko O.A., Stefanovskij D.V. Moscow: “Delo” RANEPA; 2020 (In Russian).

21. Borschev A. Simulation Modeling: The State of the Field for 2015, Trends and Forecast. AnyLogic. https://www.anylogic.ru/upload/pdf/immod15_borshchev_statia.pdf (accessed 04.04.2023) (In Russian).

22. Nikanorov S.P. Conceptualization of Subject Areas. Moscow: Concept; 2009 (In Russian).

23. Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y. Business Model Generation. Trans. from Eng. Kulnev M. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2012 (In Russian).

24. Norton D.P., Kaplan R.S. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Trans. from Eng. Pavlov M. Moscow: Olimp-Business; 2017 (In Russian).

25. Grigoriev O.V. The Age of Growth: Lectures on Neoeconomics. Moscow: Career Press; 2014 (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Sokolov D.A. The methodology genesis of system-dynamic modeling and the prospects of its application to solve the corporate change management’s digitalization problems. Vestnik Universiteta. 2023;(7):71-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-7-71-80

Views: 313


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-4277 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8415 (Online)