Abolishment of a tax on imputed income: consequences for business and budget
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-7-196-206
Abstract
The article purpose is to investigate changes of taxpayers in the simplified and patent taxation system, in the structure of tax revenues of regional and local budgets, in the tax burden on taxpayers that occurred in connection with the abolition of tax on imputed income (from 2021). The research used generally accepted methods of scientific cognition, such as analysis, synthesis, generalization, grouping, tabular method. The information base of the study was the Tax Code of the Russian Federation, official reporting data of the Federal Tax Service of Russian Federation, authors’ publications on the topic under study. The study obtained the following results. The tax revenues of local budgets decreased, having lost the source of income in the form of tax on imputed income, previously credited in full; the tax burden on taxpayers increased (when tax on imputed income was applied, it was minimal). The main conclusion of the study is the fact that the patent taxation system, which can be applied by entrepreneurs who have ceased to be payers of tax on imputed income, needs a radical transformation. It is necessary to improve the efficiency of such system in terms of determining the amount of income from which the cost of a patent is calculated.
About the Author
N. Z. Zotikov
Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolai Z. Zotikov - Cand. (Sci.) Econ., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of Finance, Credit and Economic Security,
Cheboksary
References
1. Russian Federation. The Budget Code of the Russian Federation dated July 31, 1998 no. 145-FZ (ed. on April 14, 2023). https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_19702/ (accessed 25.04.2023) (In Russian).
2. Russian Federation. Tax Code of the Russian Federation. Second part. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_28165/ (accessed 25.04.2023) (In Russian).
3. Chernousova K.S., Zhukova M.S. The consequences of the abolition of tax on imputed income in 2021 for the taxpayers of the Samara region. Evropean Science. 2021;4(60):16–19 (In Russian).
4. Styazhkina A.S., Melman I.V. Cancellation of UTII: pros, cons and consequences for small businesses. In: Modern aspects of accounting, analysis and audit. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian State University of Science and Technology named after Academician M.F. Reshetnev;2020. Pp. 88–91 (In Russian).
5. Aseev V.M., Salkina A.R. Prerequisites for the abolition of UTII and its potential consequences. Science of the XXI century: current directions of development. 2020; 1(1):225–228 (In Russian).
6. Kiryanen A.P. Interbudgetary equalization in the conditions of variability of budgetary and tax policy. Social and economic systems. 2021;3 (21):174–189 (In Russian).
7. Rasskazchikova A.A. Cancellation of tax on imputed income in Russia: increasing budget revenues or taking care of entrepreneurs. In: Problems of the development of financial and tax legislation at the present stage. Perm: Perm State National Research University; 2020. Pp. 133–136. (In Russian).
8. Bobrova E.A., Mazur L.V., Gubina O.V., Mosina E.I. Features of the formation of tax potential at the municipal level. Vestnik OrelGIET. 2021;2(56):105–114 (In Russian).
9. Prozherina V.D. Cancellation of UTII and transition to other special tax regimes: consequences for entrepreneurs. In: Actual problems of tax policy. Moscow: Pero; 2021. Pp. 313–319 (In Russian).
10. Likhter A.V. The impact of the abolition of tax on imputed income on small and medium-sized businesses in the budget of the municipality. In: Modern aspects of accounting, analysis and audit. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian State University of Science and Technology named after Academician M.F. Reshetnev; 2020. Pp.19–21 (In Russian).
11. Federal tax service. Data on the forms of statistical tax reporting. Form no. 1-NM. Report on the accrual and receipt of taxes, fees, insurance premiums and other obligatory payments to the budget system of the Russian Federation. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/ (accessed 28.04.2023) (In Russian).
12. Federal tax service. Data on the forms of statistical tax reporting. Form no. 5-UTII. Report on the tax base and the structure of accruals for a single tax on imputed income for certain types of activities. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/ (accessed 28.04.2023) (In Russian).
13. Federal Tax Service. Data on the forms of statistical tax reporting. Form no. 5-USN. Report on the tax base and the structure of charges for tax paid in connection with the application of the simplified tax system. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/ (accessed 29.04.2023) (In Russian).
14. Federal Tax Service. Data on the forms of statistical tax reporting. Form no. 1-PATENT. Report on the number of individual entrepreneurs applying the patent taxation system and issued patents for the right to apply the patent taxation system by type of entrepreneurial activity. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/ (accessed 29.04.2023) (In Russian).
15. Federal Tax Service. Unified Register of Small and medium-sized businesses. https://rmsp.nalog.ru / (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
16. Federal Tax Service. Law of the City of Moscow dated October 31, 2012 no. 53 (amended on November 24, 2021 no. 32 “On the patent system of taxation”. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn77/about_fts/docs /4348082/ (accessed 25.04.2023) (In Russian).
17. Russian Federation. Law of the Republic of Tatarstan dated September 29, 2012 no. 65-ZRT (amended on May 5, 2021 no. 30-ZRT) “On the introduction of a patent taxation system on the territory of the Republic of Tatarstan”. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn16/taxation/taxes/patent/10454938/ (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
18. Russian Federation. Law of the Republic of Mari El of October 27, 2011 no. 59-Z (amended on October 24, 2022 no. 57-Z). On the regulation of relations in the field of taxes and fees in the Republic of Mari El. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn12/about_fts/ docs/11346981/ (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
19. Russian Federation. Law of the Nizhny Novgorod Region no. 148-Z of November 21, 2012 (as amended of March 10, 2022 no. 14-Z) “On the Patent System of Taxation in the Nizhny Novgorod Region”. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn52/about_fts/docs/4293407/ (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
20. Russian Federation. Law of the Krasnodar Territory dated November 26, 2012 no. 2601-KZ (amended on November 30, 2015 no. 3279-KZ) “On the introduction of the patent taxation system in the Krasnodar Territory”. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn23/about_fts/docs/4292217/ (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
21. Russian Federation. Law of the Kaliningrad Region dated October 11, 2012 no. 154 (amended on March 30, 2017 no. 58) “On the introduction of a patent system of taxation in the Kaliningrad Region”. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn39/about_fts/docs/4856281/ (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
22. Russian Federation. Law of the Volgograd Region dated November 26, 2019 no. 120-OD (amended on February 26, 2021) “On the patent system of taxation and the invalidation of certain legislative acts”. https://www.nalog.gov.ru/rn34/about_fts/docs/9428340/ (accessed 23.04.2023) (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Zotikov N.Z. Abolishment of a tax on imputed income: consequences for business and budget. Vestnik Universiteta. 2023;(7):196-206. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-7-196-206
Views:
321
Email this article 