Adaptation of elderly people and various inequalities in the post-pandemic time
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-8-193-200
Abstract
The article studies situational inequalities emerged during the pandemic and peculiarities of adaptation of elderly people in the post-pandemic time. The research focuses on everyday projections of inequalities of elderly people living separately in the federal city and rural areas. To examine inequalities, the paper uses microsociological optics. It made it possible to analyze how structural inequalities affect the lives of the elderly and what are the ways to adapt after the pandemic that triggered the processes of protection and self-preservation. The empirical base of the study is 30 semi-structured interviews collected in 2022 in St. Petersburg and villages of the Republic of Karelia. The article describes such situational inequalities as digital inequalities, inequalities in accessing and receiving information, spatial inequalities, and inequalities in receiving medical care as main inequalities. The study concludes that emotional reflection, availabilities of hobbies or emergence of new ones, revision of previous resources, types of communication and ways of solving problems, shift of focus from caring for family and relatives to caring for themselves create positive opportunities for adaptation for older people.
About the Author
K. A. GalkinRussian Federation
Konstantin A. Galkin, Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Senior Researcher at the Health Studies Sector
Moscow
References
1. Walby S., Armstrong J., Strid S. Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology. 2012;46(2): 224–240.
2. Shpakovskaya L.L. The educational experctations of parents: A mechanism that reproduces social inequality. Journal of Social Policy Research. 2015;13(2):211–224. (In Russian).
3. Verloo M. Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2006;13(3):211–228. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753
4. Winker G., Degele N. Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2011;18(1):51–66.
5. Grigorieva I., Bogdanova E. The concept of active aging in Europe and Russia in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Laboratorium: Journal of Social Research. 2020;(2):187–211. DOI https://doi.org/10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-2-187-211 (In Russian).
6. Galkin K.A. Barriers and inequalities for older people in urban environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. 2021;(19):65–86. DOI https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2021.3 (In Russian).
7. Sheremet A.N. Pandemic of inequality. Socio-economic aspects and consequences of COVID-19. Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied Research. 2020;(4):136–141. (In Russian).
8. Cohen S.A. et al. Rural-urban differences in informal caregiving and health-related quality of life. The Journal of Rural Health. 2022;38(2):442–456.
9. Gao Q. et al. Inequalities in older age and primary health care utilization in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. International Journal of Health Services. 2022;52(1):99–114.
10. Kasar K.S., Karaman E. Life in lockdown: Social isolation, loneliness and quality of life in the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Geriatric Nursing. 2021;42(5):1222–1229.
11. Collins R. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, USA: Princeton university press; 2004. 407 p.
12. Duneier M., Molotch H. Talking city trouble: Interactional vandalism, social inequality, and the “urban interaction problem”. American Journal of Sociology. 1999;104(5):1263–1295.
Review
For citations:
Galkin K.A. Adaptation of elderly people and various inequalities in the post-pandemic time. Vestnik Universiteta. 2023;(8):193-200. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-8-193-200