The role of meso-institutions in the system of tariff regulation of energy and housing and public utilities markets

This article is aimed at expanding the applicability of meso-institutional concept in the markets of natural monopolies in the context of a new institutional economic theory. Within the framework of the considered concept the impact of the institutional environment level on evolutionary development of energy and housing and public utilities markets is evaluated alongside with modern approaches of digitalisation. In the first part of the current article the author describes theoretical foundations of the meso-institutional environment concept in respect to the energy and housing and public utilities markets. The definition of the concept and its usage domain are given. Besides, the goals difference of meso- and macro-institutions are analysed in detail. The theoretical part also covers approaches of A.E. Shastitko applied to the energy and housing and public utilities markets. Moreover, the hypothesis of conflict resolution between macro- and meso-institutions is described in framework of markets regulation mechanisms. Also, the regulation mechanisms of the two markets are analysed, including market power instruments of meso-institutions. In addition, the article covers the problem of maintaining a balance of market participants’ interests through these mechanisms. In conclusion, the author offers the concept of improving market mechanisms with the help of the meso-institutional development strategy. It is designed to solve the problem of maintaining a balance of market participants’ interests and predetermine the formation of a new improved institutional environment in the energy and housing and public utilities markets.

1. Chen P. Equilibrium illusion, economic complexity and evolutionary foundation in economic analysis. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review. 2008;5(1):81–127. https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.5.81

2. Aligica P.D., Boettke P.J. Challenging institutional analysis and development: the Bloomington School. New York: Routledge; 2009. 176 p.

3. North D.C. Institutions and economic theory. The American Economist. 1992;36(1):3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434516630194

4. Ménard C., Shirley M.M. Handbook of new institutional economics. New York: Springer; 2005. 884 p.

5. Ng Y.-K. Mesoeconomics: a micro-macro analysis. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books; 1986. 267 p.

6. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. The meso level: a new focus at economics? Moscow: Institute of Economics; 2017. 30 p. (In Russian).

7. Kleiner G.B. Mesoeconomics of development. Moscow: Nauka; 2011. 804 p. (In Russian).

8. Dopfer K., Foster J., Potts J. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2004;14(3):263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0

9. Dopfer K., Potts J. Why evolutionary realism underpins evolutionary economic analysis and theory: a reply to Runde’s critique. Journal of Institutional Economics. 2010;6(03):401–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000093

10. Ménard C., Jimenez A.J.F. de P., Tropp H. Addressing the policy-implementation gaps in water services: the key role of meso-institutions. Water International. 2017;43(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1405696

11. Williamson O.E. The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. 429 p.

12. Volynskii A.I. Mesolevel as object of research in the scientific economic literature of contemporary Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2017;9(3)36–49. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.3.036-049 (In Russian).

13. Kruglova M.S. Mesoeconomic theory in English-scientific literature. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2017;9(3):24–35. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.3.024-035 (In Russian).

14. Shastitko A.E. Meso-institutions: proliferating essences or evolving economic research programme? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;5:5–25. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-5-5-25 (In Russian).

15. Ménard С. Meso-institutions: the variety of regulatory arrangements in the water sector. Utilities Policy. 2017;49:6–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.05.001

16. Kruglova M.S. Claude Menard’s meso-institution theory and its application in the institutional design. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2018,10(3):49-57. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.3.049-057 (In Russian).

17. Mann. S. Sectors matter! Exploring mesoeconomics. New York: Springer; 2011. 252 p.

18. Maevsky V.I., Malkov S.Yu., Rubinstein A.A., Krasilnikova E.V. On one direction of development of the mesoeconomics. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2019;11(3):21–38. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.021-038 (In Russian).

19. Polterovitch V.M. Institutional traps and ways out. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2004;3:5–16. (In Russian).

20. Polterovitch V.M. Transplantation of economic institutions. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2001;3:24–50. (In Russian).