Mobilisation relations: essence, experience, and security improvement

   The present research shows the essence of the mobilisation relations system and gives their brief description, considers their objective correlation with the productive forces of society and their significance in the period of increasing confrontation with unfriendly Western countries. This system is revealed as experience of formation of these relations according to N. A. Voznesensky and also as a condition for improvement of the Russian economic security today. Methodologically, the authors consider the unity of historical and logical directions in the development of the system, its differences from the traditional statemarket model of relations with the use of updated political and economic science. The results contain the experience of modernisation of the material and technical base of the Russian economy, mobilisation regulation of business relations and the formation of a new intellectually advanced, versatile and mobile employee. Besides, applied directions for their improvement in the form of effective employment of these processes and the modernised state management mission are also part of the results. Moreover, each of these components, their various combinations and integral set are examined in terms of improving the security of society and each of its members. The research concludes that it is necessary to accelerate the implementation of mobilisation regulation of the society development and its economy, aimed at the further improvement of their security.

1. Harris S.E. Inflation and anti-inflationary policies of American states. New York: Pan American Union; 1951. 143 p.

2. Bersenev V.L. The mobilization model of the economy: the experience of historiographical analysis. In: History of science and technology in the modern system of knowledge: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference held by the History of Science and Technology Department, Yekaterinburg, February 8, 2016. Yekaterinburg: UMC UPI; 2016. Рp. 16–20. (In Russian).

3. Matskulyak I.D. The political and economic nature of market relations : monograph. Moscow: KnoRus; 2020; 442 p. (In Russian).

4. Matskulyak I.D. Political economy: textbook for universities. Moscow: Urait; 2023. 477 p. (In Russian).

5. Matskulyak I.D. Economic theory (main course): textbook for bachelor’s degree preparation in the training programmes of 38.03.01 Economics, 38.03.02 Management. Moscow: State University of Management; 2019. 380 p. (In Russian).

6. Voznesensky N.А. The military economy of the USSR during the Great Patriotic War. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1948. 192 p. (In Russian).

7. Glazyev S.Yu. Economic mobilization conditions and strategy in the Russian statehood reproduction system. Management and Business Administration. 2018;2:40–78. (In Russian).

8. Zubkov K.I. The phenomenon of the mobilisation economy: a historical and sociological analysis. In: The mobilization model of the economy: the historical experience of Russia of the twentieth century: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference, Chelyabinsk, November 28–29, 2009. Chelyabinsk: Enciklopedia; 2009. Pp. 64–71. (In Russian).

9. Nedosekin A.O. Mobilisation economy in the Russian style. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic University Publ. House ; 2015. 124 p. (In Russian).

10. Tsvetkov V.A. Mobilization economy: current issues of today. Market economy problems. 2022;3:6–15. (In Russian). doi: 10.33051/2500-2325-2022-3-6-15

11. Paydiev L.E. Fundamentals of the mobilisation economy: how can Russia be raised from its knees? 1999. 26 p. (In Russian).

12. Filin S.A., Yakushev A.Zh. The formation of conditions and strategic tools to mobilize the economy. National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2016;9(342(12):61–74. (In Russian).

13. Matskulyak I.D., Matskulyak D.I., Nagdaliev N.Z.O. Mobilisation relations: content and improvement of security. In: State regulation of the economy: political and economic aspects: Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, November 24, 2023. Moscow: State University of Management; 2023. Pp. 23–27. (In Russian).

14. Bulatov A.S., Matskulyak I.D, Rudnev V.D. Multiformity is needed, not a new uniformity of economic forms. Russian Economic Journal. 1992;9:144–150. (In Russian).