Possibilities of using econometrical methods in studying of interregional interactions of migration in transportation
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-86-94
Abstract
Thе article presents a set of methodological approaches to forecasting the spatial heterogeneity of transportation migration flows in Russia. The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological basis for forecasting the migration flows spatial heterogeneity. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the presentation and systematization of methodological approaches specific to studying socio-economic factors affecting migration flows considering spatial heterogeneity in the context of the Russia. The study has potential practical value for developing effective migration policies and strategies of spatial development in the country. The study uses general scientific methods of cognition and system-structural analysis and theoretical research method. In the course of the work, a literature review was conducted and forecasting methods applicable in studying migration flows in the ratio of transport accessibility, which are based on the real data analysis, have been analyzed. The results of the study showed that it is possible to study migration flows by spatial autocorrelation methods, and the main explanation of this process is socio-economic factors. Regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between migration flows and such factors as income level, development of transportation infrastructure, accessibility, education and other factors calculated in absolute units. The Moran index application to the migration flows analysis is a scientifically new method that allows us to study the migration spatial aspects in more depth and to identify their characteristics and interrelationships at a new level. The methods base obtained can be useful for calculations and further informed decision-making aimed at reducing spatial inequalities and stimulating sustainable spatial development.
Keywords
About the Author
A. A. BychkovaRussian Federation
Anna A. Bychkova, Junior Researcher
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Kalimullina E.R. E.G. Ravenstein’s laws in the field of objective conditions and subjective factors of migration: modern interpretation. Kazan Pedagogical Journal. 2015;5(1):214–216. (In Russian).
2. Filippov V.N., Sukov V.A. Problems of forming village labor resources. Proceedings of the Sverdlovsk Institute of National Economy. 1972;4:55–62. (In Russian).
3. Khomra A.U. Migration of the population: questions of theory, methods of research. Kiev: Nauk. dumka; 1979. 146 p. (In Russian).
4. Vlasuk T.A. Terminological analysis of the notion “migration” as a factor of influence on the transport support of satellite cities. Bulletin of BSUT: science and transport. 2019;1(38):83–85. (In Russian).
5. Minakir P.A. Strategies for Russia and in Russia. Spatial Economics. 2021;17(1):7–17. https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/ se.2021.1.007-017
6. Chichkanov V.P., Belyaevskaya-Plotnik L.A., Andreeva P.A. Modelling the Assessment of the Impact of Industry Factors on the Level of the Territories’ Socio-Economic Development and Economic Security. Economy of the Region. 2020;16(1);1–14. https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-1 (In Russian).
7. Lavrikova Y.G., Akberdina V.V. Priorities and mechanisms of interregional interactions: the experience of Ural regions within the «Ural constellation – Arctic vector» project. Region: Economics & Sociology. 2018;4(100):168–191. https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20180407 (In Russian).
8. Naumov I.V. Investigation of the Interregional Relationships in the Processes of Shaping the Territories’ Investment Potential Using the Methods of Spatial Modelling. Economy of the Region. 2019;15(3):720–735. https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-3-8 (In Russian).
9. Naumov I.V., Krasnykh S.S. The research of interregional relationships in the development of the mineral resource complex of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya vysokikh uchebnykh uchebnykh obrazovaniye. Gornyj zhurnal. 2019;8:108–124. (In Russian).
10. Dubrovskaya Yu.V. Systematization of approaches to justifying the role of interregional interaction in development of socio-economic systems. PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. Socio-economic sciences. 2018;4:197–206. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9354/2018.4.16 (In Russian).
11. Serebryakova S.V. Macroregion: Sociological analysis of the models of interaction between the subjects of the Russian Federation (on the example of the Volga Federal District). Vestnik Bashkirskogo Universita. 2009;1:256–260. (In Russian).
12. Bakumenko O.A. Interregional cooperation as a factor of regional socio-economic development (on the example of the North West Federal District). Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Pravo. Upravlenie. 2016;4:32–47. (In Russian).
13. Reiterer М. Interregionalism as a new diplomatic tool: the EU and East Asia. EFAR. 2006;11:223–242.
14. Musakwa W., Niekerk A.V. Monitoring Urban Sprawl and Sustainable Urban Development Using the Moran Index: A Case Study of Stellenbosch, South Africa. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research. 2014;5(3):20. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijagr.2014070101
15. Pavlov Yu.V., Koroleva E.N. Spatial Interactions: Evaluation with the Help of Global and Local Moran’s Index. Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika. 2014;3:95–110. (In Russian).
16. Manaeva I.V., Kanischeva A.V. Estimation of spatial autocorrelation in the cities of the Siberian Federal District. In: Spatial development of territories: Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, Belgorod, November 26–27, 2020. Belgorod: Belgorod State National Research University; 2020. Pp. 25–32. (In Russian).
17. Vakulenko E.S. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. House; 2013. (In Russian).
18. Lin J. Comparison of Moran’s I and Geary’s C in Multivariate Spatial Pattern Analysis. Geographical Analysis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12355
19. Marchetti S., Tzavidis N. Robust Estimation of the Theil Index and the Gini Coeffient for Small Areas. Journal of Official Statistics. 2021;37(4). https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0041
20. Naumov I.V., Nikulina N.L., Sirotin D.V. et al. Theory and methodology of modeling of spatial development of territories, monograph. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2020. 270 p. (In Russian).
21. Westerholt R. A revised understanding of the influence of the variance of spatial weights on the Getis-Ord statistic. In: 31st Annual GIS Research UK Conference (GISRUK), Glasgow, 2023. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7825279
22. Wang Z., Lam N.S. Extending Getis-Ord statistics to account for local space-time autocorrelation in spatial panel data. The Professional Geographer. 2020;72(3):411–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2019.1709215
23. White T.J. Sharing Resources: The Global Distribution of the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics. 2007;64:402–410.
24. Mamurov B.J., Abdullaev Zh.Zh. Regression analysis as a means of studying the dependence between variables. European Science. 2021;2(58):7–10. (In Russian).
25. Krivov Y.V. Application of regression analysis for building migration models. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo bezopasnosti. 2009;3:100–104. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Bychkova A.A. Possibilities of using econometrical methods in studying of interregional interactions of migration in transportation. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(2):86-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-86-94