Attitude to tattooing in modern Russian society: Regional aspect
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-215-221
Abstract
The article considers theoretical and applied basis for analyzing tattooing phenomenon as one of the most widespread bodily practices in modern society. The patterns of attitude to this phenomenon and characteristic of modern society have been highlighted. Certain limitations of these studies and their fragmentation have been noted. The integral variant of this phenomenon analysis, including four components of the attitude to tattoo (cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and motivational) and considering peculiarities of social attitudes of the three main subjects occupying different positions in relation to tattoo (tattoo masters, their clients and a control group without tattoos) has been offered. The empirical study results have been presented, which made it possible to reveal regional specificity of the structure of attitude to the phenomenon of Perm residents (according to such parameters as cognitive component of attitude to tattoo (awareness of tattooing), emotional (assessment of tattoo as a social phenomenon; emotional attitude of relatives, close environment, and respondent to tattoo), behavioral (presence of tattoos; tattooed body parts; desire to get/remove a tattoo in the future), motivational (reasons for getting a tattoo; motives for choosing tattoo design in the future), and motivational ones (reasons for getting a tattoo; motives for getting a tattoo in the future).
About the Author
V. V. LevchenkoRussian Federation
Valery V. Levchenko, Dr. Sci. (Psy.), Head of the Sociology and Political Science Department
Perm
References
1. Korableva O.V. On the issue of public attitudes to tattoos. Karelian Scientific Journal. 2020;3(32):85–89. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.26140/knz4-2020-0903-0020.
2. Pivovarov A.M. Sociology of the body in search of its identity: Analysis of research programs. Sociological Journal. 2019;4:9–27. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2019.25.4.6814.
3. Antonova N.L., Merenkov A.V. Human body as a project: Modeling practices. Vestnik of PSTU. Socio-economic sciences. 2019;2:8–20. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9354/2019.2.1.
4. Vlasova O.A. Erving Goffman’s sociology of person: Personality as resistance of society in the theories of stigma and total institutions. Sociological Journal. 2011;4:5–20. (In Russian).
5. Grednovskaya E.V. The problem of bodily liberty and determinancy concept habitusa P. Bourdieu. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Social and Humanitarian Sciences. 2009;9(142):120–124. (In Russian).
6. Shemyakina E.V. A philosophical analysis of the term “Body Discipline”. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2014;169:34–38. (In Russian).
7. Batsanova S.V. Strategies for constructing physicality in modern culture. Belgorod; 2018. 90 p. (In Russian).
8. Golman E.A. Female physicality. Diss. … Cand. Sci. (Sociol.): 22.00.01. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2015. 239 p. (In Russian).
9. Vorobyeva E.S. Tattooing as an object of sociological research. Theoretical and methodological aspects. Moscow; 2018. 29 p. (In Russian).
10. Batsanova S.V. Protest physicality. Bulletin of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov. 2015;4. (In Russian).
11. Rudenko I.N. Tattoos in the criminal world and modern fashion. Vestnik Magistratury. 2018;1-2. (In Russian).
12. Vorobyeva E.S. Development of motivation to tattooing as a mechanism of identity construction. Theory and practice of social development. 2016;6:41–47. (In Russian).
13. Gafiatulina N.H., Ivanova E.V. Subcultural features of tattoo practices as a way of diagnosing the social health of youth. Engineering Journal of Don. 2015;4-1. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Levchenko V.V. Attitude to tattooing in modern Russian society: Regional aspect. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(2):215-221. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-215-221