The problem of determining value orientations in modern psychology
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-228-234
Abstract
The article analyzes approaches to value orientations study in Russian and foreign psychology. The definition of value orientations based on the reflection, activity, activity, determinism principles has been clarified. The features of the approach to the value orientations study in Russian psychology are represented by three directions – philosophical, concrete-scientific and psychological. The features of the value orientations study in foreign psychology have been presented, where the main attention is paid to the problems of personality typology on the basis of its value orientations and their role in the activity motivation. Each person is guided by what is considered by him as important, essential, and strives to achieve what acquires for him subjective value. Within the framework of general psychology and personality psychology, we always mean individually significant values, on which a person is oriented, – value orientations. A refined definition of value orientations as a mental dimension of the reflected objective reality in the form of subjective significance of its components, which is analyzed in the directionality of the subject’s activity and structured in accordance with the level of its spiritual and moral component, has been given.
About the Authors
I. A. Bakushkin
State Social and Humanitarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Bakushkin, Postgraduate Student
Moscow
I. M. Ilicheva
State Social and Humanitarian University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina M. Ilicheva, Dr. Sci. (Psy.), Prof. at the Psychology Department
Moscow
References
1. Ilyichev L.F. Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskaya Encyclopedia; 1983. 840 p. (In Russian).
2. Rokeach M. The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press; 1973. 438 p.
3. Zolyan L.R. Terms of psychology: structural-semantic analysis. Yerevan: YSU; 2022. 176 p. (In Russian).
4. Ozhegov S.I. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: ITI Tekhnologii; 2006. 941 p. (In Russian).
5. Dahl V.I. Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language: in 4 vol. 8th ed. Moscow: Russky Yaz.; 1981–1982. 595 p. (In Russian).
6. Vyzhletsov G.P. Axiology: formation and main stages of development. Socio-political journal. 1995;6:61–73. (In Russian).
7. Leontiev D.A. Sketch of personality psychology. 2nd ed. Moscow: Smysl; 1997. 64 p. (In Russian).
8. Vasilyuk F.E. Psychotechnics of Choice. In: Psychology with a Human Face: Humanistic Perspective in Post-Soviet Psychology. Moscow: Smysl; 1997. Pp. 284–314. (In Russian).
9. Mazurov A.B., Ilyicheva I.M., Koptiubenko S.A., Lykin S.S. Spiritual and moral education. Kolomna: MGOSGI; 2011. 239 p. (In Russian).
10. Leontiev D.A. Test of sense-life orientations. Moscow: Smysl; 2006. 18 p. (In Russian).
11. Zdravomyslov A.G. Needs. Interests. Values. Moscow: Politizdat; 1986. 221 p. (In Russian).
12. Olshansky V.B. Personality and Social Values. Vol. 1. Moscow: Smysl; 1966. Pp. 470–530. (In Russian).
13. Vygotsky L.S. Pedagogical psychology. Moscow: Pedagogy; 1986. 386 p. (In Russian).
14. Bogomaz S.A., Galazhinsky E.V., Vaulina T.A. Valuable bases of psychological science and psychology of values. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2008. 314 p. (In Russian).
15. Vygotsky L.S. Collected Works. Vol. 1: Questions of theory and history of psychology. Moscow: Pedagogy; 1982. 488 p. (In Russian).
16. Hofstede G., Minkov M., Vinken H. Values Survey Module 2008 Manual. 2008.
17. Vernon P.E., Allport G.W. Study of Values. APA PsycTests; 1931. https://doi.org/10.1037/t27307-000. https://doi.org/10.1037/t27307-000
18. Frankl V. Man in Search of Meaning. Moscow: Progress; 1990. 368 p. (In Russian).
19. Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1984. 327 p.
20. Baichinska K. Theoretical and methodological problems in studying the structure of the value system. Vol. 8. Sotsiologicheski pregled; 1989.
21. Baichinska K. Values. Tsennostenosten stress... Tsennostnostna kriza! Sofia: Marin Drinov Publ. House; 1994. 254 p.
22. Ball-Rokeach S.J., Rokeach M., Grube J.W. The Great American Values Test: Influencing behavior and belief through television. Psychology Today. 1984;18(11):34–36,38–41.
23. Schwartz S.H. Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. Measuring attitudes crossnationally. 2007;169:204. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209458.n9
Review
For citations:
Bakushkin I.A., Ilicheva I.M. The problem of determining value orientations in modern psychology. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(2):228-234. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-2-228-234
Views:
393
Email this article 