Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

Vestnik Universiteta

Advanced search

The phenomenon of procrastination

https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-6-212-219

Abstract

   Procrastination is one of the most researched and polemized topics of interest to domestic and foreign scientists due to its widespread prevalence among students and adults. The authors agree that syste matic violation of deadlines for necessary tasks completion causes subjective discomfort, but this behavior is regularly manifested in ordinary life, becoming “chronic” in nature.

   The purpose of the study is to analyze the phenomenon of procrastination.

   The work was based on the theoretical analysis of literature, generalization, empirical research results interpretation, conducted on the basis of a bank of techniques: E. Yu. Mandrikova’s questionnaire of self-organization of activity, K. Lay’s academic procrastination scale, Melbourne questionnaire of decision-making in the adaptation of T. V. Kornilova and S. A. Kornilova. Procrastination is similar to manifestations of laziness, low level of motivation and volitional self-regulation, awareness of the consequences of one’s own inaction, behavioral patterns repetition stability. However, there
are cardinal differences among them: laziness correlates with neutral or positive emotional background, hedonistic orientation, orientation to the present time, irresponsibility, and strength saving. Procrastination is built on burdensome experiences, mental immersion in the events of the past or future. It is energy-consuming, can lead to ideas destruction about one’s own personality and chronic diseases. Negative emotional background, weak self-control and low self-regulation are all prerequisites for developing procrastination and dependence on digital reality. The study results can be applied in the activities of teachers and practical psychologists, allowing to recognize and level procrastination manifestations.

About the Author

T. N. Kochetkova
Northwestern Institute of Management – branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Tatiana N. Kochetkova, Cand. Sci. (Psy.), Assoc. Prof.

Social Technologies Department

St. Petersburg



References

1. Sluchenkova K.A. Procrastination: features of definitions and their psychological meaning. Psychology. Historical-critical Reviews and Current Researches. 2018;7(4А):18–26. (In Russian).

2. Sirois F.M., Stride C.B., Pychyl T.A. Procrastination and health: A longitudinal test of the roles of stress and health behaviours. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2023;28:860–875. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12658

3. Klingsieck K.B. Procrastination. When good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist. 2013;1(18):24–34.

4. Barabanshchikova V.V., Marusanova G.I. Perspectives for research of the procrastination phenomenon in professional work. National psychological journal. 2015;4(20):130–140. (In Russian).

5. Kornienko D.S., Rudnova N.A. Online social network usage, procrastination and selfreguiation. Psychological Studies. 2018;11(59):9. (In Russian). doi: 10.54359/ps.v11i59.284

6. Barabanshchikova V.V., Kaminskaya E.O. Procrastination phenomenon in virtual project team members. National psychological journal. 2013;2(10):43–51. (In Russian).

7. Borodina L.F. Ideas about procrastination in foreign studies. Human capital. 2019;6-2(126):207–211. (In Russian).

8. Kormachyova I.N., Klepikova N.M. Procrastination: phenomenon and scientific problem. Systems Psychology and Sociology. 2019;4(32):18–29. (In Russian). doi: 10.25688/2223-6872.2019.32.4.02

9. Shejnov V.P. Relationship of smartphone dependence with personal states and properties. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2020;4:120–127. (In Russian). doi: 10.33581/2521-6821-2020-4-120-127

10. Przepiorka A., Blachnio A., Cudo A. Procrastination and problematic new media use: the mediating role of future anxiety. Current Psychology. 2023;42:5169–5177. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01773-w

11. Raskov D.E. Laziness and Procrastination as Practices of Activism. International Journal of Cultural Research. 2020;1(38):79–89. (In Russian). doi: 10.24411/2079-1100-2020-00005

12. Zobkov A.V. On procrastination as a psychological defence of personality. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2023;2(62):468–483. (In Russian). doi: 10.32744/pse.2023.2.27

13. Kurdenko A.N. Procrastination and lazy: the psychological content of concepts. PEM: Psychology. Educology. Medicine. 2019;1:128–136. (In Russian).

14. Smanov D.A. Cognitive features and predictors of procrastination. Research Result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education. 2023;9(2):97–109. (In Russian). doi: 10.18413/2313-8971-2023-9-2-0-8

15. Chevrenidi A.A. Procrastination in the Structure of Personality’s Temporal Relations. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Psychology. 2016;9(3):104–113. (In Russian).

16. Sysoev T.A. Ethos of laziness in Russian culture. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy. 2019;3:92–108. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Kochetkova T.N. The phenomenon of procrastination. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(6):212-219. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-6-212-219

Views: 652


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-4277 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8415 (Online)