Changing relationships between armaments production and exports and state defense expenditures
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-8-5-13
Abstract
The present study is relevant, because in different countries of the world in recent years there have been ambiguous dynamics among armaments and military equipment production and exports and changes in state defense expenditures. Modern geopolitical conflicts distort the existing picture of interrelations between the above parameters, and the article assesses their changes. In particular, as the study result, the underlying hypotheses on the relationships between supply and demand in the global market of armaments and military equipment have been formulated. The key countries analysis showed that the dynamics of indicators in them is determined by different reasons, but the author came to the conclusion that the main factors of changes in the trends of armaments production and exports and defense expenditures are the following: the expansion of illegal circulation of armaments and military equipment in some countries, increased vulnerability of some countries and their direct involvement in military-political conflicts, as well as differentiation of countries’ approaches to national security, which causes different attention to defense capabilities and the defense industry development. At the same time, there are almost always sharp changes and volatility of the indicators under consideration during the periods when a country is in the stage of industrialization or transition to a new technological mode.
About the Author
D. A. RepnikovRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Repnikov, Canf. Sci. (Econ.), Deputy Director of the Innovation Technology Center (Science Policy Complex)
Moscow
References
1. George J., Sandler T. Demand for Military Spending in NATO, 1968–2015: A Spatial Panel Approach. European Journal of Political Economy. 2018;53:222–236.
2. Brender A. Government Ideology and Arms Exports. ILE Working Paper Series, No. 21. Hamburg: University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics (ILE); 2018. 38 p.
3. Pamp O., Thurner P.W. Trading Arms and the Demand for Military Expenditures: Empirical Explorations Using new SIPRI-Data. Defence and Peace Economics. 2017;4(28):457–472.
4. Garfinkel M.R., Syropoulos C., Yotov Y.V. Arming in the global economy: The importance of trade with enemies and friends. Journal of International Economics. 2020;123:103295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103295
5. Dunne P., Garcia-Alonso M., Levine P., Smith P. Determining the defence industrial base. Defence and Peace Economics. 2007;3(18):199–221.
6. Blum J. Arms production, national defense spending and arms trade: Examining supply and demand. Working Paper, No. 310. Munich: Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich; 2019. 37 p.
7. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Comparative Analysis of Global Instruments on Firearms and other Conventional Arms: Synergies for Implementation. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime; 2016. 84 p.
8. Garfinkel M.R., Skaperdas S., Syropoulos C. Trade and insecure resources. Journal of International Economics. 2015;1(95):98–114.
9. Willett S. East Asia’s changing defense industry. Survival, Autumn. Global Politics and Strategy. 1997;3(39):107–134.
10. Martin S. (ed.) The economics of offsets: defense procurement and countertrade. Harwood, L.; 1996. 352 p.
Review
For citations:
Repnikov D.A. Changing relationships between armaments production and exports and state defense expenditures. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(8):5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-8-5-13