Involving unused land in the economic turnover of the agricultural sector of a region: institutional regulation and economic feasibility
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-8-95-108
Abstract
The article shows the necessity of institutional regulation of the process of involving unused agricultural land into the economic turnover of the agrarian sphere of a region. It presents quantitative and qualitative characteristics of previously withdrawn agricultural lands, their territorial distribution by soil and climatic microzones and administrative districts of a region, unused period duration, residual fertility level (in terms of humus content), and land plots degradation degree. A calculation-analytical complex such as an algorithm representing a four-stage mechanism of analysis, preparation and decision-making on the choice of the land plots restoration method and their further use option has been developed and proposed for use. It is recommended to use three options for land plots restoration: direct return to economic turnover in case of a short period of non-use; carrying out cultural and technical measures with subsequent implementation into the turnover; transfer to another category of use in case of a high degree of degradation and low fertility level. The developed algorithm of unused agricultural land involvement is aimed at preserving the land potential of a region, strengthening the rational land use system. The presented stages provide not only theoretical and methodological, but also practical significance. Application scope is scientific organizations, agroindustrial complex management bodies at the municipal and regional levels, and agricultural producers.
About the Author
V. I. Trofimova
Povolzhskiy Scientific Research Institute of Economic and Organization of Agroindustrial Complex – Subdivision of the Saratov Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valentina I. Trofimova, Cand Sci. (Agr.), Senior Researcher
Saratov
References
1. Nikonova G.N. Institutional aspects of land relations regulation. Nikonovskie chteniya. 2006;11:372–373. (In Russian).
2. Nikonova G.N., Trafimov A.G. Institutional bases of land market state regulation in the agrarian sector. Ekonomika novogo mira. 2017;4(8):37–51. (In Russian).
3. Fedyunina E.N., Oganesyan L.O. Institutional Factors of Agricultural Land Market Functioning. Journal of Economic Theory. 2019;4(8):810–823. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-4.16
4. Trofimova V.I. Economic behavior of agricultural land market subjects. Upravlenie/Management (Russia). 2023;4(11):90–99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-4-90-99
5. Shagaida N.I. Institutional prerequisites of agricultural land turnover in Russia. Moscow: ERD; 2006. 151 p. (In Russian).
6. Karpushkina A.V. Institutional regulation of interaction between government and business structures. Vestnik South Ural State University. 2013;1:111–114. (In Russian).
7. Okhlopkov V.E. Institutional bases of higher qualification training system in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia): state and prospects. Yakutsk; 2003. 148 p. (In Russian).
8. Poteenko A.G. Perfection of the institutions providing improvement of the investments–innovations ratio. Vestnik Saratov State Socio-Economic University. 2011;4(38):181–184. (In Russian).
9. Kirdina S.G. Institutional matrices and development of Russia: introduction to X-Y-theory. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoria; 2014. 468 p. (In Russian).
10. Auzan A.A. Institutional Economics for Dummies. Moscow: Fashion Press; 2011. 127 p. (In Russian).
11. Kleiner G.B. Evolution of institutional systems. Moscow: Nauka; 240 p. (In Russian).
12. Polterovich V.M. Economic institutions transplantation. Economic Science of Modern Russia. 2001;3:24–50. (In Russian).
13. Sukharev O.S. Institutional theory and institutional policy. Vol. 1. Institutional theory. Methodical sketch. Moscow: Ekonomika; 2007. 516 p. (In Russian).
14. North D.S. Understanding the process of economic change. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. House; 2010. 256 p. (In Russian).
15. Hayek F. Individualism and economic order. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2020. 424 p. (In Russian).
16. Hodgson D. Economic theory and institutions. Moscow: Delo; 2003. 464 p. (In Russian).
17. Soto E. de. A different path. Invisible Revolution in the Third World. Moscow: Catallaxy; 1995. 320 p. (In Russian).
18. Tambovtsev V.L. Institutional changes in Russian economy. Sotsialnye nauki i sovremennost. 1999;4:44–53. (In Russian).
19. Emelyanova T.A., Stolyarov V.M., Lomakin G.V., Melnikova A.A. Current issues of unused lands into turnover implementation. Moscow Economic Journal. 2019;11. (In Russian).
20. Kustova S.B. Improving the methods of state regulation over the market of agricultural lands in the region (Russia, Мagadan). Problems of Modern Economics. 2019;2(70):219–222. (In Russian).
21. Kiryushin V.I. Methodology for integrated assessment of agricultural lands. Eurasian Soil Science. 2020;7:871–879. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032180X20070060
22. Sinitsina N.E., Grishin P.N., Varyukhin A.M. Soil cover of the Saratov region and its agroecological characterization. Saratov: Saratov State Vavilov Agrarian University; 2010. 124 p. (In Russian).
23. Grishin P.N., Kravchenko V.V., Boldyrev V.A. Soils of the Saratov region, their origin, composition and agrochemical properties. Saratov: Saratov University Publ. House; 2011. 174 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Trofimova V.I. Involving unused land in the economic turnover of the agricultural sector of a region: institutional regulation and economic feasibility. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(8):95-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-8-95-108
Views:
127
Email this article 