Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

Vestnik Universiteta

Advanced search

Instruments to stimulate competition in public procurement: international practice

https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-1-173-183

Abstract

This article considers the tools used in foreign practice to increase competition and remove restrictions on participation of companies in public procurement. Open competition means that all qualified companies have the right to participate in the public procurement on the basis of fair consideration of their bids and selection of the winner, and the right to appeal. The results of the study have identified the tools that ensure competitiveness of the procurement in foreign practices, are used in the formation of regulatory and legal framework of the contractual system, in bidding, at the stage of contract execution. When bidding procedures are prepared, competition is ensured through the use of a single online platform and exclusion of unreasonable or unnecessary requirements for bidders, except for qualification requirements, which makes it possible to increase attractiveness of the bidding for enterprises and number of participants. At the stage of preparation for the bidding, procuring authorities should analyse the market and form specifications focused on functional criteria for the goods to be supplied to reduce risks of biased selection of the winner. When competitive procedures are held, it is necessary to exclude the possibility of manipulation of criteria for evaluation of proposals and collusion of participants. At the post-contract stage one needs to develop mechanisms to identify possible violations and illegal actions. Based on the results of the study, the indicators that can be used to assess competition of the public procurement in the Russian Federation are formed.

About the Author

T. V. Tischenko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Tatyana V. Tischenko, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of the Budget Policy Research 

Moscow



References

1. Pozmogova D.A. Problems of law enforcement in the procurement of goods, works, services from small businesses. Meridian. 2019;9(27):150–153. (In Russian).

2. Reshetov K.Yu., Baranova S.V., Lesnikov I.I., Abrahamyan A.R. The public procurement system in Russia: current state, problems, directions of development. Bulletin of the National Institute of Business. 2022;1(45):120–129. (In Russian).

3. Geller A.Ya. Issue analysis of contracts termination in Russian state and municipal public procurement procedures. Vestnik universiteteta. 2022;5:5–12. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-5-5-12

4. Shatsky D.E. Improvement of the state contract system: causes of problems and ways of their solutions. Vestnik universiteta. 2018;2:120–125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-2-120-125

5. Coviello D., Mariniello M. Publicity requirements in public procurement: evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Public Economics. 2014;109:76–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.10.008

6. Ohashi H. Effects of transparency in procurement practices on government expenditure: a case study of municipal public works. Review of Industrial Organization. 2009;3(34):267–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9208-1

7. Abdou A., Сzibik Á., Tóth B., Fazekas M. COVID-19 emergency public procurement in Romania: corruption risks and market behavior. In: Working paper series: GTI-WP/2021:03. Budapest: Government Transparency Institute; 2021.

8. Cullen A.M. The small business set-aside program: where achievement means consistently failing to meet small business contracting goals. Public Contract Law Journal. 2012;3(41):703–720.

9. Fazekas M., Blum J.R. Improving public procurement outcomes: review of tools and the state of the evidence base. Policy Research Working Paper Series. 2021;9690.

10. Anderson R.D., Kovacic W.Е. Competition policy and international trade liberalization: essential complements to ensure good performance in public procurement markets. Public Procurement Law Review. 2009;2:67–101.

11. Olken B.A. Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy. 2007;2(115):200–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/517935

12. Lagunes P. Guardians of accountability: a field experiment on corruption & inefficiency in local public works. International Growth Centre Working Paper. 2017;54.


Review

For citations:


Tischenko T.V. Instruments to stimulate competition in public procurement: international practice. Vestnik Universiteta. 2025;(1):173-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-1-173-183

Views: 107


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-4277 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8415 (Online)