Industrial historical objects transformation as a tool of the regional policy of the EAEU countries
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-53-61
Abstract
An original analysis of the available options of strategies for implementing historical industrial objects transformations has been carried out. Successful examples of project implementation have been presented. Recommendations for organizing work in the field of systematizing transformation projects of historical industrial objects have been offered. The purpose of the study is to examine historical industrial objects transformation as a tool for implementing the regional policy of the EAEU countries. The typology of strategies used for the objects transformation has been carried out. The specifics of each strategy on the example of the implemented projects and promising opportunities for the use of historical industrial objects in the context of regional policy implementation by the EAEU countries have been determined. The array of publications on the subject has been processed, the results of already realized projects have been studied. The comparative method, system analysis, strategic approach, and phenomena typologization were used to identify the most frequently used strategies of objects transformation. The reuse of industrial buildings allows obtaining several effects: increasing the life cycle of industrial buildings, the territory attractiveness, the regional investment attractiveness, new jobs, and improving the environment. A new institutional structure has been proposed to systematize the work in the field of historical industrial objects transformation and to integrate the efforts of all stakeholders. It has been recommended to create a new database that will include promising sites for transformation, which will allow to attract participants for projects implementation.
About the Author
M. V. OlshanskayaRussian Federation
Maria V. Olshanskaya – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Deputy Director for Development of the Higher School of Industrial Policy and Entrepreneurship
Moscow
References
1. Lutsevich A.D. Structural factors of regional development of the Republic of Belarus in the context of the EAEU. Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Economics. Sociology. Biology. 2021;2(11):19–24. (In Russian).
2. Abilov A.Zh., Mametov A.A. Urban planning issues in modern Kazakhstan. In: Diversity of urban worlds: history, theory, practice: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference with international participation dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the birth of Professor E.N. Pertsik, Moscow, March 23–24, 2021. Moscow: Faculty of Geography of the Lomonosov Moscow State University; 2021. Рp. 183–191. (In Russian).
3. Muksinova R.M., Filipenko E.F. Some aspects of the impact of socio-economic transformations on the architecture of Bishkek city. Herald of KRSU. 2021;8(21):97–101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.36979/1694-500X-2021-21-8-97-101
4. Tsepilova O.P. Analysis of the experience of re-adaptation of industrial architecture. Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov. 2020;12:74–90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34031/2071-7318-2020-5-12-74-90
5. Snitko A.V. Features and contradictions of the protection of industrial buildings as objects of cultural heritage. Appearance. Volga Scientific Journal. 2023;2:153–159. (In Russian).
6. Barbashin M.Yu., Barkov F.A., Volkov Yu.G., Gvintovkin A.N., Sadko D.O., Serikov A.V., Chernous V.V. Twenty years of reforms in Russia through the eyes of residents of the Rostov region. Rostov-on-Don: Antei; 2012. 172 p. (In Russian).
7. Efimov A.V., Panova N.G. The coloristic culture of the architect. The evolution of color preferences in architecture. Architecture and Construction of Russia. 2015;1(205):30–39. (In Russian).
8. Bulgakova I.N. A functional approach to the development of economic mechanisms and enterprise management. Modern problems of science and education. 2013;3:34–38. (In Russian).
9. Maksimenko E.A., Oblasov Yu.A., Polevaia A.S. The analysis of the study of the structure of industrial architecture objects. Science Prospects. 2023;4(163):128–131. (In Russian).
10. Gaiduk A.R. Renovation of industrial facilities and adaptation of the industrial zones of the cities to modern conditions (on the example of Kazan). News of KSUAE. 2016;4(38):83–88. (In Russian).
11. Sukhanova I.A. Competitiveness of the region: main ways of improvement. World Science. 2017;5(5):42–51. (In Russian).
12. Chaiko D.S. The inclusion of monuments of industrial architecture in the modern urban environment. Aspirant i soiskatel. 2021;1:53–59. (In Russian).
13. Borovikova N.V. Criteria for conservation of industrial heritage. Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2019;2:52–62. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2019-21-2-52-62
14. Akhmedova E.A. City masterplan and possibilities of its realization in the modern economic conditions. Industrial and civil engineering. 2010;8:6–10. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Olshanskaya M.V. Industrial historical objects transformation as a tool of the regional policy of the EAEU countries. Vestnik Universiteta. 2025;(2):53-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-53-61