Peculiarities of involvement of working students with different locus of control
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-211-221
Abstract
The relationship between involvement and locus of control has been studied. The subject of the study is the involvement of working students with internal and external locus of control. The purpose of the study is to identify the relationship between the involvement degree of working students with different locus of control. In the course of theoretical analysis, the multifaceted nature of the involvement phenomenon in different scientific fields and its psychological properties have been revealed. The research review is presented by early scientific works on the issue of internalization and involvement. The empirical part presents the description of the study of working students. The average involvement and internality scores among working students have been studied: they are involved in their work, and the scores are above average. The dependence of the indicators of internality and involvement of working students has been revealed empirically and substantiated theoretically: the higher their internality, the higher the involvement degree in their work. According to the study results, working students who have a high index of internality in the sphere of achievements are more energetic and involved in work. The significant role of the achievement phenomenon in the professional sphere has been revealed.
Keywords
About the Author
V. S. Kazanbaeva
Russian New University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria S. Kazanbaeva – Postgraduate Student
Moscow
References
1. Frager R., Feidiman J. Theories of personality and personal growth. Moscow: OLMA PRESS; 2004. 657 p. (In Russian).
2. Malyavina S.S., Fadeeva O.V., Kruchinkina V.I., Modina T.F. Personal development of youth in modern Russia: results of an empirical study. Kazan Pedagogical Journal. 2022;6(155):213–220. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.51379/KPJ.2022.157.7.027
3. Kiryukhina A.A. Personnel involvement as an urgent direction in organization development. In: Current scientific research: Proceedings of the XV International Scientific and Practical Conference, Penza, November 20, 2023. Penza: Nauka i Prosveschenie; 2023. Pp. 228–231. (In Russian).
4. Gerasimenko O.V. Personnel involvement as a key factor of economic efficiency. Telescope: Journal of Sociological and Marketing Research. 2021;2:56–59. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.51692/1994-3776_2021_2_56
5. Leonova I.S. Subjective well-being and labor involvement of older employees: a gender aspect. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Sociology. Politology. 2020;4(20):412–418. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1818-9601-2020-20-4-412-418
6. Pavlova E.V. The involvement of youth in the space of life fulfillment: the problem of identifying markers and predictors. Nauchnoe mnenie. 2022;12:66–74. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2022_12_66
7. Samal E.V., Plaschinskaya K.Yu. Hardiness and life satisfaction among students with different locus of control. Scientific works of the Republican Institute of Higher Education. Historical and psychological and pedagogical sciences. 2022;223:302–309. (In Russian).
8. Zhuravleva A.K. The relationship between the locus of control and self-relations of employees of the internal affair bodies. Psychology and pedagogy of official activity. 2023;1:27–32. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-932X-2023-9-1-0-5
9. Merzlyakova S.V., Kondrashova V.S. Internality as a predictor of family self-determination in the youthful age. The Herald of SouthUral State Humanities-Pedagogical University. 2024;1(179):267–285. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25588/CSPU.2024.179.1.013
10. Povarenkov Yu.P., Fadeeva E.S. Individual features of career goal-setting of students with different levels of internality and externality. Methodology of modern psychology. 2022;16:271–281. (In Russian).
11. Bidenko R.A. Internality as a factor of the coordinating behavior of cadets of the military institute of the National Guard of the Russian Federation. SMALTA. 2021;2:38–45. (In Russian).
12. Simonova N.N., Tunkina M.A., Korneeva Ya.A., Trofimova A.A. Adaptability as a predictor to the change of functional states in participants of a marine scientific expedition to the Arctic. National Psychological Journal. 2022;4(48):65–79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0407
13. Kovalevich M., Leonyuk N. Internality as a condition for the implementation of plans for professional and personal growth and development of future preschool education specialists. Praleska. 2021;11(363):3–7. (In Russian).
14. Chernobrovkina S.V. Internality as a resource person of the student in a crisis of youth. In: Dementiy L.I., Malenova A.Yu., Malenov A.A. (eds.) Social, professional, and personal responsibility of personality in modern society: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation, Omsk, October 8–10, 2020. Omsk: Omsk State University; 2020. Pp. 505–508. (In Russian).
15. Vesnin A.S. Internality as a factor of coping behavior and cognitive assessment of the exam situation in students at the initial stage of higher education. In: Dementiy L.I., Malenova A.Yu., Malenov A.A. (eds.) Social, professional, and personal responsibility of personality in modern society: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation, Omsk, October 8–10, 2020. Omsk: Omsk State University; 2020. Pp. 567–570. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kazanbaeva V.S. Peculiarities of involvement of working students with different locus of control. Vestnik Universiteta. 2025;(2):211-221. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-211-221
Views:
113
Email this article 