The interrelation of individual adaptive capabilities and peculiarities of living in crisis situations in adulthood
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-222-229
Abstract
Psychological adaptation and individual possibilities in the process of living in crisis situations have been revealed. The crisis situation concept has been analyzed in detail. For the most effective living of crisis situations people need highly developed adaptive capabilities of personality. It is one of the key moments of constructive crisis living. The purpose of the study is to identify the interrelation of individual adaptive capabilities and peculiarities of living in crisis situations in adulthood. Hypothesis of the study is that there is a connection between individual adaptive capabilities and peculiarities of living in crisis situations in adulthood. The study involved 40 people, among them 80 % of women and 20 % of men aged 25 to 45 years (M = 35,95). The following methods were used for empirical research: theoretical and analytical literature review, diagnostic techniques (Personal Experience of Psychological Crisis questionnaire by S.V. Dukhnovsky and Adaptability multilevel personality questionnaire by A.G. Maklakov and S.V. Chermyanin), and Spearman correlation analysis. It has been found that the majority of respondents are in constructive living of the acute crisis with a favorable forecast of the way out of the crisis situation. At the same time, 65 % of the respondents have a low level of personal adaptation potential. Using the mathematical statistics methods the presence of the interrelation of adaptive capacity and living in crisis situations in adulthood has been revealed.
About the Authors
S. A. MalegonovaRussian Federation
Svetlana A. Malegonova – Senior Lecturer at the Clinical Psychology Department
Barnaul
I. A. Ralnikova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Ralnikova – Dr. Sci. (Psy.), Head of the Social Psychology and Teacher Education Department
Barnaul
References
1. Tsvetkov V.L. Psychology of conflict. From theory to practice. Moscow: UNITY-DANA; 2022. 184 p. (In Russian).
2. Polyushkevich O.A. Generational life scenario. Sociology. 2020;3:28–45. (In Russian).
3. Grishina N.V., Kostromina S.N., Mironenko I.A. A problematic field structure of contemporary psychology of personality. Psychological Journal. 2018;1(39):26–35. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.7868/s0205959218010038
4. Smoleva E.O. The measuring of social stress: analysis of research methods and experience. Social and humanitarian technologies. 2020;3(15):70–79. (In Russian).
5. Maklakov A.G. The personal adaptive potential: its mobilization and prognostication in extreme conditions. Psychological Journal. 2014;1:16–24. (In Russian).
6. Dubrovin D.N. Psychological adaptation as a factor of personal self-determination. Dis. ... Cand. Sci. (Psy.): 19.00.07. Moscow; 2005. 136 p. (In Russian).
7. Kalinenko V.K. Borders in culture and culture at borders. Journal of Practical Psychology and Psychoanalysis. 2008;1. (In Russian).
8. Levkovskaya G.P., Sorochinskaya V.E., Shtifurok V.S. Adaptation of first-year students in a higher educational institution. Moscow; 2001. 128 p. (In Russian).
9. Petrovsky V.A. Psychology of maladaptive activity. Moscow: Gorbunok; 1992. 224 p. (In Russian).
10. Furman A.V. Psychodiagnostics of personal adaptation. Kharkov: KHNU; 2013. 64 p. (In Russian).
11. Rozov V.I. Psychology of extreme situations: adaptability to stress and psychological support. K.: KNT; 2011. 478 p. (In Russian).
12. Philips L. Human Adaptation and his Failures. N.Y.; 1968. 288 p.
13. Rogozyan A.B. Stress-resistance in the context of the theoretical construct of psychological resources of personality. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Pedagogy and Psychology. 2011;1:140–145. (In Russian).
14. Vyzulina K.S. Socio-psychological adaptation of personality in the context of the connection of subjective assessment of professional relevance. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015;12-3(21):106–108. (In Russian).
15. Yasko B.A., Kazarin B.V., Gorodin V.N., Skripnichenko L.S., Skorobogatov V.V., Chugunova N.A., Pokul L.V. Hardiness and Personal Resources of Red Zone Staff: Psychological Analysis. Bulletin of RSMU. 2021;4:63–70.
16. Raigorodsky D.Ya. Practical psychodiagnostics. Moscow: Bakhrakh-M; 2001. 672 p. (In Russian).
17. Dukhnovsky S.V. Diagnostics of interpersonal relations in the work of a practical educational psychologist. Kurgan: KSU; 2016. 190 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Malegonova S.A., Ralnikova I.A. The interrelation of individual adaptive capabilities and peculiarities of living in crisis situations in adulthood. Vestnik Universiteta. 2025;(2):222-229. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-2-222-229