Analysis of artificial intelligence use by university teachers
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-7-45-55
Abstract
The article presents results of usage analysis of artificial intelligence (hereinafter referred to as AI) in the lecturers’ activity in institutes and universities. The main tasks facing teachers in developing and maintaining training courses are considered. The methodological part discusses the provisions of scientific publications concerning the use of AI in teaching as well as analyses the research results describing the possibilities of applying the technology by university lecturers. It is shown that modern AI models provide a wide range of opportunities to support teaching activities, ranging from automation of periodically performed tasks to the creation of unique educational content. As a result of the analysis of the sources, it is shown that AI can provide significant support to teachers in creating educational materials, assessing students’ knowledge, checking homework, testing and analysing their assignments. The authors have conducted a comparison of the most used GPT (generative pre-trained transformer) models to determine what can be obtained from them for teaching at university. The results are presented with a pilot survey of lecturers which was conducted at the end of 2024. According to the data obtained, teachers begin to use neural networks to fulfill their professional duties. It is revealed that most of them positively assess the application of AI for educational purposes, but face limitations, including technical and organisational barriers. It shows which types of work use GPT models most often. The lecturers’ wishes for advanced training in the field of AI application have been determined.
About the Authors
B. E. TokarevRussian Federation
Boris E. Tokarev -Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. at the Marketing Department
Moscow
B. A. Rossikhin
Russian Federation
Boris A. Rossikhin - Senior Lecturer at the Marketing Department
Moscow
References
1. Taulli T. Artificial intelligence basics. A non-technical introduction. New York: Apress; 2019. 195 p.
2. Markides C.C., Geroski P.A. Fast second. How smart companies bypass radical innovation to enter and dominate new markets. Trans. from Eng. S.B. Ilyin. Moscow: Vershina; 2006. 240 p. (In Russian).
3. Tokarev B.E. Analysis of prospects for the use of artificial intelligence technologies for the training of marketers. Journal of Marketing in Russia and Abroad. 2004;3(161):95–103. (In Russian).
4. Tokarev B.E., Rossikhin B.A. Consumer journey of higher education services: legitimisation of artificial intelligence for training marketers. Vestnik universiteta. 2025;5:28–37. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-5-28-37
5. Lukichyov P.M., Chekmarev O.P. Risks of the artificial intelligence application in the short term. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2023;4(13):2443–2460. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.4.119359
6. Agaltsova D.V., Valkova Yu.E. Artificial intelligence technologies for the higher education teachers. The world of science, culture and education. 2023;2(99):5–7. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2023-299-5-7
7. Ersozlu Z., Taheri S., Koch I. A review of machine learning methods used for educational data. Education and Information Technologies. 2024;29:22125–22145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12704-0
8. Toktarova V.I., Popova O.G., Sagdullina I.I., Belyanin V.A. Artificial intelligence technologies in modern higher education. Vestnik of the Mari State University. 2023;2(50(17):210–220. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30914/2072-6783-2023-17-2-210-220
9. Khalilov D. ChatGPT for every day. 333 promts for business and marketing. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 140 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Tokarev B.E., Rossikhin B.A. Analysis of artificial intelligence use by university teachers. Vestnik Universiteta. 2025;1(7):45-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-7-45-55