Features of irrational obligations of men and women from different generations
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-9-264-278
Abstract
The article indicates that women are more likely to become clients of psychotherapists, and depression occurs among them twice as often as among men. The researchers associate the reasons for differences with the peculiarities of the emotional sphere of women, and their emotionality – with biological factors. Based on the theoretical analysis, proceeding from the significance of irrational beliefs of the individual for experiencing emotions and in the development of depression as well as from the role of the family and current social conditions in the formation of the attitudes themselves, hypotheses are formulated regarding the number, spheres of action, and content of the attitudes of men and women. To identify irrational obligations, the method of unfinished sentences is used. The sample consists of two groups of respondents (from generations Y and Z). The sample size is 323 people. Semantic analysis is used to process the data. The hypotheses of the study are confirmed. Irrational obligations in the survey participants of generations Y and Z differ in the representation of types of the obligations. In terms of attitudes, respondents of generation Z are more progressive, while those of generation Y are more conservative. The differences in the progressiveness of the attitudes between them are more pronounced in men. Women of both generations have a greater number of obligations (concerning their behaviour), and they are associated with a greater number of spheres of life. In conclusion, it is suggested that the basis for women’s psychological well-being (in general) may be a softening of attitudes and a narrowing of the spheres of obligations, laid down in the process of upbringing and socialisation, as well as a convergence of the attitudes of men and women.
About the Author
Yu. I. LobanovaRussian Federation
Yuliia I. Lobanova, Cand. Sci. (Psy.), Assoc. Prof. at the History and Philosophy Department
St. Petersburg
References
1. Nuber U. Who am I without you? Why women are more likely to suffer from depression and how they find themselves. Trans. from Ger. I. Solntseva. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2021. 260 p. (In Russian).
2. Dubovskikh Yu.V., Chiker V.A. Features of family values of representatives of different generations. St. Petersburg Psychological Journal. 2022;39. (In Russian).
3. Kulikov L.V. Psychology of mood. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University; 1997. 225 p. (In Russian).
4. Subbotina N.D. Natural reasons for differences in the character of man and woman. Humanitarian Vector. 2022;2(17):35–46. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-2-35-46
5. Khoch N.S., Shtepa N.A. The younger generation of Russia: peculiarities of gender transformations of male and female. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. Series: Psychology. 2005;1(45):131–133. (In Russian).
6. Vodopyanova N.E. Psychodiagnostics of stress. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2009. 336 p. (In Russian).
7. Il’in E.P. Рsychology of individual differences. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2011. 701 р. (In Russian).
8. Il’in E.P. Emotions and feelings. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2005. 412 p. (In Russian).
9. Givon E., Berkovich R., Oz-Cohen E., Rubinstein K., Singer-Landau E., Udelsman-Danieli G et al. Are women truly “more emotional” than men? Sex differences in an indirect model-based measure of emotional feelings. Current Psychology. 2023;36(42):32469–32482.
10. Mead M. Male and female. Trans. from Eng. M. Oshurkov, L. Mikhailova, D. Kutuzova. Moscow: Rosspen; 2004. 412 p. (In Russian).
11. Weigard A., Loviska A.M., Beltz A.M. Little evidence for sex or ovarian hormone influences on affective variability. Scientific Reports. 2021;1(11). http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00143-7
12. Simonova O.A. Sociology of emotions and sociology of morality: moral emotions in contemporary society. Sociological yearbook. 2014;1:148–187. (In Russian).
13. Ellis A. Humanistic psychotherapy. The rational-emotional approach. Trans. from Eng. R. Balyberdin, M. Danilenko, I. Firsova. St. Petersburg: Sova; 2002. 272 p. (In Russian).
14. Orlov Yu.M. Resentment. Fault. 5th ed. Moscow: Slajding; 2004. 87 p. (In Russian).
15. Breslav G.M. Resentment as the subject-matter of psychological study: from forgiveness to the lack of forgiveness. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2020;1(17):27–42. (In Russian). http://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-1-27-42
16. Вeck А., Rush A., Shaw B., Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression. Trans. from Eng. A.M. Tatlybayeva. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2003. 304 p. (In Russian).
17. Chrysidis S., Turner M.J., Wood A.G. The effects of REBT on irrational beliefs, self-determined motivation, and self-efficacy in American football. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2020;19(38):2215–2224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1776924
18. Davis H., Turner M.J. The use of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) to increase the self-determined motivation and psychological well-being of triathletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. 2020;4(9):489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000191
19. Michel-Kröhler A., Turner M.J. Link between irrational beliefs and important markers of mental health in a German sample of athletes: differences between gender, sport-type, and performance level. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918329
20. Dontsov A.I., Stefanenko T.G. Social stereotypes: yesterday, today, tomorrow. In: Social psychology: chrestomathy. Moscow: Aspeсt-Press; 2008. Pp. 170–187. (In Russian).
21. Karnelovich M.M., Kazarenkov V.I. Male and female auto- and heterostereotypes of Russian and Belarusian youth. Vestnik universiteta. 2022;3:192–200. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-3-192-200
22. Isaeva M.A. Crisis and rise generations in W. Strauss and N. Howe’s theory. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2011;3:290–295. (In Russian).
23. Mahmoud A.B., Fuxman L., Mohr I., Reisel W.D., Grigoriouet N. “We aren’t your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower. 2021;1(42):193–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448
24. Sagituly G., Guo J. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: comparing generations X and Y. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2023;2(37). https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2163622
25. Wang Z., Luo Yi., Cao X., Jiang J. The twisted path to sacredness: a grounded theory study of irrational religious orientation and its psycho-sociological implications BMC Psychology. 2024;1(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01858-8
26. Nguyen N.T.H. Are millennials different? A time-lag study of federal millennial and generation X employees’ affective commitment. Public Personnel Management. 2023;2(52):143–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221129840
27. Yadov V.A. Sociological research: methodology, programme, methods. Samara: Samara University; 1995. 328 p. (In Russian).
28. Lobanova J.I. Interactive technologies for professional stability development. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2014;1(5):27–39. (In Russian).
29. Osipova L.V., Artem’eva V.A., Bodnya A.I., Godlinik O.B., Lobanova Yu.I., Solov’eva E. A. et al. Socio-psychological methods of personality and small group research: textbook. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; 2013. 112 p. (In Russian).
30. Geodakian V.A. Sexual dimorphism and а “paternal effect”. 1981;5(42):657–668. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Lobanova Yu.I. Features of irrational obligations of men and women from different generations. Vestnik Universiteta. 2025;(9):264-278. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2025-9-264-278




































