Innovative research on information technology-driven digital transformation in manufacturing enterprises

In the context of Industry 4.0 and digital transformation, the path and mechanism of information technology reconstructing the management mode of production and manufacturing enterprises have been studied. The current research analyzes the management impact of this technology on manufacturing enterprises and points out its effectiveness in this field. The object of the study is China’s smart factories. The purpose of the study is to determine how these information technologies affect the management of various links in the manufacturing industry. The following methods have been applied: analysis, induction, measurement, comparison, statistics. The results of the research include an analysis of the policies formulated by the governments of Germany, Russia, and China to promote the digital transformation of advanced technologies in the manufacturing industry, as well as the innovative application of information technology in enterprise management production, logistics, sales, decision-making, and other aspects, and its successful application in smart factories in China. The feasibility of empowering enterprise management processes through the introduction of new information technologies has been demonstrated. The study indicates that the application of information technology in the manufacturing industry has a positive impact. Through technology in enterprise management, various innovative scenarios can be achieved, and advanced technology can be promoted in related industries in the future to improve management efficiency and reduce costs. Through the deep integration of technology and management, the successful practice of Chinese manufacturing industry provides a feasible paradigm for global digital transformation.

1. Zhang, T. (2025). Optimization of management in Chinese industry: Integration of artificial intelligence and data management. Innovations and Investments, (3), 108–111.

2. Schumpeter, J., & Swedberg, R. (1947). Theoretical problems of economic growth: Reprinted from Journal of Economic History Supplement. Journal of Economic History, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351311489-19

3. Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. IEEE. https://doi.org10.1109/HICSS.1999.772658

4. Zhang, T. (2023). Empirical analysis of industrial digital transformation in China and in the world. Financial Business, (11), 322–325.

5. Dong, K. (2022). The “14th Five-year Plan” intelligent manufacturing development plan interpretation and trend analysis. China Industry & Information Technology, (1), 26–29. https://doi.org10.19609/j.cnki.cn10-1299/f.2022.01.004

6. Rezunkov, D. A., & Shornikova, N. Y. (2024). Comparative analysis of frameworks and neural network architectures for computer vision. In Pedagogika, psikhologiya i ekonomika: vyzovy sovremennosti i tendentsii razvitiya (pp. 100–108). Moscow International Academy. (In Russian).

7. Rao, M. C., & Rao, P. K. (2009). Inventory turnover ratio as a supply chain performance measure. Serbian Journal of Management, 4(1), 41–50.

8. Manullang, A. E. A., Togatorop, D., Purba, P. R. D., et al. (2020). The significance of accounts receivable turnover, debt to equity ratio, current ratio to the probability of manufacturing companies. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 4(3), 464–471. https://doi.org10.23887/ijssb.v4i3.27874