The dynamics of the development of leadership ideas: socio-psychological aspects of the development of leadership theories
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-5-297-312
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the dynamics of the development of leadership theories through the prism of socio-psychological factors. The purpose of the study is to identify patterns of transformation of leadership concepts caused by changes in the social context, group needs and goals, and ideas about the legitimization of power, starting from antiquity and ending with modern leadership models. The research methodology is based on a historical and theoretical analysis of the views and theories of leadership of representatives of various eras.
As a result of the analysis, the authors came to the following conclusions: leadership is a dynamic and dialogical process where the leader’s power is based on the interaction of the leader and his followers, rather than being reduced to static innate characteristics of the individual; the evolution of leadership theories is based on changes in the socio-historical context, the transformation of group needs and rethinking the nature of the legitimization of power; The effectiveness of a leader depends on the leader’s ability to adapt to a particular situation, conform to group values, and maintain a dialogue with followers.
The main results of the research can be applied in practice to develop management models or leadership development programs in organizations. Further research may be related to the study of the influence of digital technologies on the phenomenon of leadership, as well as an in-depth analysis of collective forms of leadership.
About the Authors
R. A. DenisovRussian Federation
Roman A. Denisov – Student
Moscow
M. V. Iontseva
Russian Federation
Maria V. Iontseva – Dr. Sci. ( Psy.), Professor at the Department of Sociology, Psychology of Management and History
Moscow
L. Yu. Shuraeva
Russian Federation
Larisa Yu. Shuraeva – Cand. Sci. (Psy.), Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology, Management Psychology and History
Moscow
References
1. Veber, M. (2008). Types of domination. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo, 10(5–6), 22–36. (In Russian).
2. Reeve, C.D.C. (2004). Plato: Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
3. Ambler, W. (2001). The education of Cyrus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
4. Aristotle (2000). Rhetoric; Poetics. Trans. From ancient Greek O.P. Tsybenko et al.; edited by O.A. Sychev, I.V. Peshkov. Moscow: Labyrinth. (In Russian).
5. Cicero. (1972). Three treatises on public speaking. Trans. and edited by F.A. Petrovsky, I.P. Strelnikova, M.L. Gasparov. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
6. Pokrovsky, M.M. (1913). Interpretation of Cicero's treatise De re publica: from listeners’ notes with lecture editing. Moscow: Society of Mutual Assistance of Philology Students of Moscow University. (In Russian).
7. Ni, P. (2017). Understanding the Analects of Confucius: Trans. of Lunyu with annotations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8. Kraut, R. (2002). Aristotle: political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dyck, A.R. (2004). A commentary on Cicero, De legibus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Cicero, M.T. Cicero de officiis. Trans. from Eng. W. Miller. New-York: The Macmillan co.
11. Ferrari, G.R.F. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Aquinas, T. (2002). Summa theologica. Part 1: Questions 1–43. Trans. A.A. Yeremeev, A.A. Yudin. Kiev: Elga, Nika-Center. (In Russian).
13. Machiavelli, N. (1990). The Prince. Trans. from Italian by G. Muravyeva. Moscow: Planeta. (In Russian)
14. Hobbes, T. (1936). Leviathan, or The Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. Pref. and ed. by A. Cheskis. Moscow: Sotsekgiz. (In Russian).
15. Locke, J. (2014). Two Treatises of Government. Trans. from Eng. by E.S. Lagutina, Yu.V. Semenov. Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Sotsium.
16. Tyler, T.R., Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
17. Stogdill, R.M. (1948). Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of the Literature. The Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 35–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362
18. Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Umansky, L.I. (1980). Psychology of Organizational Activities of Schoolchildren. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. (In Russian).
20. Krichevsky, R.L. (2016). Psychology of leadership. In: Leadership and small group, 60–78. In Russian).
21. Petrovsky, A.V. (1982). Personality, activity, and the collective. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russian).
22. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
23. Lord, R.G., Maher, K.J. (2002). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. New York: Routledge.
24. Pearce, C.L., Conger, J.A. (2002). Shared leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Review
For citations:
Denisov R.A., Iontseva M.V., Shuraeva L.Yu. The dynamics of the development of leadership ideas: socio-psychological aspects of the development of leadership theories. Vestnik Universiteta. 2026;(5):297-312. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-5-297-312
JATS XML



































