NEOCATASTROPHISM: SOCIOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS UPON NEW RISKS IN THE ECOLOGICAL DOMAIN
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2017-12-205-210
Abstract
About the Author
A. PerovaRussian Federation
References
1. Artanovsky S. N. Globalizatsiya i de-globalizatsiya [Globalization and de-globalization]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosydarstvennogo yniversiteta kultury i isskustv [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University of culture and arts], 2011, I. 4 (9), pp. 6–14.
2. Beck U. Obshestvo riska. Na puti k drugomy moderny. [Risk society. Towards a new modernity]. Moscow, ProgressTraditsiya, 2000. 384 p.
3. Beck U. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009. 240 p.
4. Brunsma D. L., Overfelt D., Picou J. S. (eds.). The sociology of Katrina. Perspectives on a modern catastrophe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield publishers, inc., 2010. 390 p.
5. Marx K., Engels F. The Manifesto of the Communist party. Moscow: Foreign Languages, 1988. 92 p.
6. Nagano M. Suicides rise among Fukushima nuclear disaster evacuees. 2015, 28 Dec. Available at: http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201512280026 (Accessed: 07 November 2017).
7. Sassen S. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, 2014. 304 p.
8. Samuels J. Buddhist disaster relief: monks, networks, and the politics of religion // Asian Ethnology, 75 (1), 2016. Pp. 53–74.
9. The National Diet of Japan. The official report of the Fukushima nuclear accident Independent Investigation Commission: Executive summary. 2012. Available at: https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/fukushima/naiic_report.pdf (Accessed: 09 November 2017).
10. Thomas D. S. K., Phillips B. D., Lovekamp W. E., Fothergill A. (eds.). Social vulnerability to disasters. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013. 406 p.
11. Urry J. Climate Change and Society. Malden, Polity Press, 2011. 217 p.
Review
For citations:
Perova A. NEOCATASTROPHISM: SOCIOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS UPON NEW RISKS IN THE ECOLOGICAL DOMAIN. Vestnik Universiteta. 2017;(12):205-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2017-12-205-210