BALANCE PROBLEMS OF INTERRELATIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-1-63-67
Abstract
The article reviews the problems preventing the formation of the integrated national innovation system of Russia. It has been concluded that most of these problems are related to the lack of a balance in cooperative links both between the institutions, components of national innovation system (NIS), and inside these institutions. The possibility of using the concept of the triple helix, based on the creation of a system of horizontal network interactions, was considered in the process of building the domestic NIS. The resources that the state expands on the imposition of standard actions to develop innovative competencies for the subjects of the innovation system was proposed to redirect on the institutionalization of independently emerging horizontal links between them, and on the analysis and dissemination of positive experience in establishing «innovative links» at all levels.
About the Author
Y. Danilina
Центральный экономико-математический институт Российской академии наук
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Vegner-Kozlova E.O. Kontseptual’nye teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty ispol’zovaniya modeli «troynoy spirali» [Conceptual theoretical and methodological aspects of using the «triple helix» model] // Vestnik YuRGTU [Bulletin of Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University], 2014, I. 4, pp. 11–17.
2. Guseynova T.N. Modeli proizvodstva innovatsiy [Models of innovation production] // Vestnik Universiteta MGIMO [Bulletin of MGIMO University], 2016, I. 3 (48), pp. 54–65.
3. Ivanov V.V. Innovatsionnaya paradigma XXI [Innovative paradigm XXI] / V.V.2; Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. M.: Nauka, 2011. 4. Ivanova S.A. Osnovnye problemy innovatsionnogo razvitiya Rossii (komparativnyy analiz) [The main problems of Russia’s innovative development (comparative analysis)] // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii [Modern scientific researches and innovations], 2014, I. 4, Vol. 1. Available at: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/04/33127 (Accessed: 28 November 2017).
4. Kruglyy stol ekspertov innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti [Round table of innovation experts] [electronic resource]. URL: http://maginnov.ru/assets/files/analytics/kruglyj-stol-ekspertov-innovacionnoj-deyatelnosti.pdf (date of the application: 18.09.2017).
5. Mikhelashvili N.R. Perspektivy razvitiya rossiyskoy modeli natsional’noy innovatsionnoy sistemy [Prospects for the development of the Russian model of the national innovation system] // Ekonomika i menedzhment innovatsionnykh tekhnologiy [Economics and innovations management], 2016, I 1. Available at: http://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2016/01/10696 (Accessed: 24 November 2017).
6. Rybachuk M.A. Sistemnyy vzglyad na vzaimodeystvie nauki, gosudarstva, obrazovaniya i biznesa [Systemic view on the interaction of science, the state, education and business] // Forsayt «Rossiya»: novoe proizvodstvo dlya novoy ekonomiki. T. 3: sbornik materialov Sankt-Peterburgskogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo kongressa (SPEK-2016) [Foresight-Russia “Russia”: a new production for the new economy. Vol. 3: proceedings of the St. Petersburg international economic Congress (SPEK-2016)]. Ed. by S.D. Bodrunova. Moscow, INIR, Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya, 2016. Pp. 240–24.
7. Smorodinskaya N.V. Troynaya spiral’ kak novaya matritsa ekonomicheskikh sistem [Triple helix as a new matrix of economic systems] // Innovatsii [Innovations]. 2011. T. 150. № 4. Pp. 66–78.
8. GII-2017: Kak innovatsii kormyat mir i Rossiyu [How Innovation Feeds the World and Russia]. Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/news/206860724.html (Accessed: 24 November 2017).
9. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. «Mode 3» and «Quadruple Helix»: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem // International Journal of Technology Management, 2009, Vol. 46, I. ¾, pp. 201–234.
10. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The triple helix of university industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development // EASST Review, 1995, Vol. 14, I. 1. – Pp. 14–19.
11. Foray D., Goddard J., Beldarrain X.G., Landabaso M., McCann P., Morgan K., Nauwelaers C., Ortega‐Argiles R., Mulatero F. Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS3). Brussels, European Commission, 2012. 119 p.
12. Freeman С. Japan: A new national system of innovation // G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (eds.). Technical change and economic theory. Lonodon, Frances Pinter, 1988. Pp. 31–54.
13. Freeman С. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London, Frances Pinter, 1987. Pp. 38–66.
14. Lundvall B.-A. Product innovation and user–producer interaction [electronic resource]. Industrial Development Research Series No. 31. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg, 1985. Available at: http://vbn.aau.dk/files/7556474/user-producer.pdf (Accessed: 24 November 2017).
15. Rothwell R. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process // International marketing review, 1994, Vol. 11, I. 1, pp. 7–31.
Review
For citations:
Danilina Y. BALANCE PROBLEMS OF INTERRELATIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Vestnik Universiteta. 2018;(1):63-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-1-63-67
Views:
576
Email this article 