COMPONENTS OF IDEAS ABOUT SELF-EFFICACY OF THE SPECIALIST
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-3-177-182
Abstract
In the research of psychologists, much attention is paid to the study of the potential conditions that determine the success of professional activity and social interaction. Own idea of one’s own abilities and possibilities of managing one’s life, confidence in one’s own success and productivity of activity, accompanied by a positive emotional state, are constituent elements of a holistic phenomenon, defined by A Bandura as self-efficacy. Self-efficacy creates a positive context for the life path, positive development, and the success of emotional regulation. However, self-efficacy is not a static general characteristic of the individual. It is far more promising to view self-efficacy as an important variable, qualitative and quantitative parameters of self-efficacy are interconnected with the real situation, as well as with the experience and emotionality of the subject. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of self-efficacy are interconnected with the real situation, as well as with the experience and emotionality of the subject. The level of self-efficacy actually determines a person’s readiness to choose a strategy of success-oriented behavior in a difficult situation for him. The article presents the results of an empirical study that made it possible to formulate conclusions about the identified levels of characteristics that can speak about the level of specialist self-efficacy.
About the Authors
N. G. Salmina
M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Psy.)
Moscow
E. V. Zvonova
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Ped.)
Moscow
E. Yu. Elizarova
LLC “Tsentr kineziologii”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Psychologist
Moscow
References
1. Gordeeva T. O. The psychology of achievement motivation: theories, facts, techniques, Moscow, Smysl-Akademiya, 2006, 227 p. (In Russian).
2. Zvonova E. V., Ngo T. N. Possibilities to use the sample internet at studying motivation of migrants labour, Distantsionnoe i virtual’noe obuchenie, 2016, no. 9 (111), pp. 90–98. (In Russian).
3. Il’icheva I. M., Syrkin L. D., Lyapin A. S., Andreeva E. N. On the issue of targeted training at the university (socio-psychologicalaspect), Psychology of Education in a Multicultural Space, 2018, no. 41 (1), pp. 92–101. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24888/2073-8439-2018-41-1-92-101
4. Caprara J., Cervone D. Personality determinants, dynamics, and potentials, translated from English by V. Belousov, St. Petersburg, Pite, 2003, 640 p. (In Russian).
5. Smirnov S. D. Self-concepts, their role in motivation, formation of the personality, and development, Voprosy Psychologii, 2001, no. 6, pp. 120–121. (In Russian).
6. Bandura A. Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies, Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.003
7. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency, American Psychologist, 1982, vol. 37 (2), pp. 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
8. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 1977, vol. 84 (2), pp. 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
9. Dweck C. S. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development, Philadelphia, Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 1999, 195 p.
10. Maddi S. R. Hardiness: Turning stressful circumstances into resilient growth (Springer Briefs in Psychology), 2013 Edition, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag GmbH, 2013, 100 p.
11. Mischel W. On the interface of cognition and personality: Beyond the person-situation debate, American Psychologist, 1979, vol. 34 (9), pp. 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.9.740
12. Mischel W. Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades, L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, The Guilford Press, 1990, pp. 11–134.
13. Mischel W., Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure, Psychological Reports, 1995, vol. 102 (2), pp. 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
14. Rotter J. B. (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966, vol. 80 (1), pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
15. Seryakova S. B., Zvonova E. V., Seryakova V. V. Social and psychological conditions of career planning of employees in the organization, Espacios, 2018, vol. 39, no. 5, p. 29.
16. Seligman M. E. Helplessnes: On depression, development, and death, San Francisco, Freeman, 1975, 250 p.
17. White R. W. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence, Psychological Review, 1959, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
18. Weiner В. Judgments of responsibility. A foundation for a theory of social conduct, N.Y., Guilford Press, 1995, 301 p
Review
For citations:
Salmina N.G., Zvonova E.V., Elizarova E.Yu. COMPONENTS OF IDEAS ABOUT SELF-EFFICACY OF THE SPECIALIST. Vestnik Universiteta. 2021;(3):177-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-3-177-182
Views:
449
Email this article 