The state and development trends of the informal services market in the Russia in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-8-97-106
Abstract
Many experts expressed their point of view about the harmful impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic on the economy. Without disputing this position, which is popular in Russian and foreign media, the authors have been conducted research on the shadow market of services in 19 regions of Russia in 2020 and 2021, and have been concluded that the global pandemic has an extremely insignificant negative impact on the shadow market of services in Russia. The majority of shadow respondents did not note a significant decrease in the level of income due to the pandemic, nor a change in professional employment, nor a significant change in the level of competition. The reasons for this state of affairs became: high social mobility, social activity, high adaptability of the shadow market to any crises and changes than in the official sectors of the economy, a high level of trust between subjects and consumers of services in this sector of the economy, a high speed of reaction of this market to the needs of customers.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. A. YurasovRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
Penza
M. A. Tanina
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
Penza
V. A. Yudina
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
Penza
E. V. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
Penza
References
1. Gimpel’son V., Kapelyushnikov R. Is it normal to be informal? Higher School of Economics Economic Journal, 2013, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3–43. (In Russian).
2. Gimpel’son V., Kapelyushnikov R. To live in the shadows or to die in the light: informality in the Russian labor market, Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2013, no. 11, pp. 65–88. (In Russian).
3. Galbright J. K. Economic theories and goals of society, Under the general edition and with a preface by N. N. Inozemtsev, A. G. Mileikovskii. Moscow, Progress, 1976, 408 p. (In Russian).
4. Zakalyuzhnaya N. Agency labor and remote employment as the main forms of non-standard employment relationships. Moscow University Law Bulletin, 2015, no. 4, pp. 97–104. (In Russian).
5. Kleman K. Russian style of flexibility: essay of new forms of labour and subordination in the human services, Sociological Journal, 2007, no. 4, pp. 74–96. (In Russian)
6. Klyamkin I. M., Timofeev L. Shadow Russia: economic and sociological research. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities, 2000, 595 p. (In Russian).
7. Toshchenko Zh. T. Precariat: from a proto-class to a new class, Monograph. Moscow, Nauka, 2018, 350 p. (In Russian).
8. Yurasov I. А., Tanina M. А., Yudina V. А., Kuznetsova E. V. Analysis of labor and leisure practices of shadow self-employed on the physical labor market in Russia, Vestnik universiteta, 2021, no. 1, pp. 172–180. (In Russian)
9. Goldtorp J. Social class and differentiation of employment contracts. Available at: http://www.sociology/kharkov.ua/socio/docs/problem (accessed: 09.06.2021). (In Russian).
10. Kapelyushnikov R. Informal employment in Russia: what do the alternative definitions say?, Higher School of Economics Working Papers, WP3/2012/04. Available at: https://iq/hse/ru/news/177671307.html (accessed 09.06.2021). (In Russian).
11. Nilov A. Shopkeepers. The birth of the underground economy. Notes of an underground millionaire. Available at: https://public.wikireading.ru/79537 (accessed 04.06.2021). (In Russian).
12. Portes A. Informal economy and its paradoxes. Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/166/131/1231/Portes_rus4_red.pdf (accessed 09.06.2021). (In Russian).
13. Teslya A. The state that produces anxiety, Expert.ru. Available at: https://expert.ru/expert/2020/01/gosudarstvo-kotoroe-proizvodit-trevogu/ (accessed 03.06.2021). (In Russian).
14. Bashlakova V., Bashlakov H. The study of the shadow economy in modern conditions: Theory, methodology, practice, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2020, no. 81 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.10.032
15. Bourdieu P. Precarite is today everywhere (Le precariate est aujourd’hui partout), Paris, Contre-feux, 1998, no. 1, pp. 96–102. (In French).
16. Davidescu A. Revisiting the relationship between unemployment rates and shadow economy. A Toda-Yamamoto approach for the case of Romania, Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, vol. 10, pp. 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00297-4
17. Dörre K. Is a new underclass emerging? Comments on the return of the social question to politics (Entsteht eine neue Unterschicht? Anmerkungen zur Ruckkehr der sozialen Frage in die Politik), Working Papers: Economic Sociology, Germany, Jena, 2007, no. 1, pp. 45–60. (In German).
18. Gudko A. Russia emerges into the shadows, Infosecurity Today, 2006, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1742-6847(06)70431-1
19. Kiselkina O., Salyahov E., Fakhrutdinov R. Kamasheva A. Assessment of influence of the labor shadow sector on the economic growth of the Russian economy with the using methods of statistical modeling, Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, no. 23, pp. 180–184 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00525-0
Review
For citations:
Yurasov I.A., Tanina M.A., Yudina V.A., Kuznetsova E.V. The state and development trends of the informal services market in the Russia in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vestnik Universiteta. 2021;1(8):97-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-8-97-106