Top.Mail.Ru
Preview

Vestnik Universiteta

Advanced search

Parties in the digital jungle

https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-12-168-178

Abstract

The development of digital technology, Internet communications and social media affects all areas of public life. Politics is no exception. In today’s world, social media are becoming not only a means of transmitting information, but also the habitat of millenials and zoomers. Year after year, more and more digital natives (M. Prensky’s term) are gaining the right to vote in elections. This fact cannot avoid political parties, which are beginning to adapt the use of social media to their own informational and campaigning needs. Social platforms present an opportunity to form a loyal community, which will follow the political process through the prism of the values of the preferred party, and eventually become politically active in the coming elections. The author questions whether the role of social media is so great, what determines it and whether young people engaged in politics through social media are really capable of changing the course of the political process. To answer these questions, a sociological study was conducted that included an analysis of the official accounts of political parties and their members in the main social media operating in Russia. The audience engagement index was compiled and calculated in relation to the results of the elections to the State Duma of the 8th convocation in 2021. 

About the Author

I. A. Lavrov
State University of Management
Russian Federation

Senior specialist, 

Moscow



References

1. Svinin A. A. Social networks as Internet-technologies in electoral campaigns: international view, RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2013, no. 2, pp. 157–163. (In Russian).

2. Statistics and content analytics of digital communities in social media, Popsters. Available at: https://popsters.ru/ (accessed 10.09.2021).

3. On the results of the elections held on the unified day of voting on September 19, 2021, Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.cikrf.ru/smi/informatsionnye-materialy/o-rezultatakh-vyborov-19-sentyabrya-2021-goda.php#itogi (accessed 29.09.2021).

4. Mediascope expanded mobile Internet measurements to all of Russia, Mediascope. Available at: https://mediascope.net/news/1067271/ (accessed 22.09.2021).

5. Internet audience in Russia in 2020, Mediascope. Available at: https://mediascope.net/news/1250827./ (accessed 22.09.2021).

6. A new generation of Internet users: a study of Russian youth online habits and behavior, Think with Google. Available at: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/ru-ru/consumer-insights/consumer-trends/novoe-pokolenie-internet-polzovatelei-issledovanie-privychek-i-povedeniia-rossiiskoi-molodezhi-onlain/ (accessed 11.09.2021).

7. Bruns A., Moon B. Social media in Australian Federal elections: comparing the 2013 and 2016 campaigns, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2018, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018766505

8. Bui T. H. The influence of social media in Vietnam’s elite politics, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 2016, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341603500204

9. Fadillah D., Zheng Lin L., Hao D. Social media and general elections in Malaysia 2018 and Indonesia 2019, Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 2019, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8.

10. Kraus S. The Great Debates. Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2001, 444 p.

11. Ndlela M. N. Social media and elections in Kenya, The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, 2015, pp. 460–471. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-34

12. Nieland J. U. Politainment, The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecp047

13. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants, On the Horizon, 2001, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

14. Reddick C. G., Aikins S. K. Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance. Political, policy and management implications, New York, Springer, 276 p.

15. Ryfe D. M. Franklin Roosevelt and the fireside chats, Journal of Communication, 1999, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02818.x

16. Skovsgaard M., Van Dalen A. Dodging the gatekeepers? Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections, Information, Communication & Society, 2013, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 737–756.

17. Zhang W. Social media and elections in Singapore: comparing 2011 and 2015, Chinese Journal of Communication, 2016, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1231129


Review

For citations:


Lavrov I.A. Parties in the digital jungle. Vestnik Universiteta. 2021;(12):168-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-12-168-178

Views: 431


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-4277 (Print)
ISSN 2686-8415 (Online)