Trends, contradictions, and patterns of functioning of interregional and inter-municipal cooperation institutions
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-12-50-57
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to reveal the existing trends, contradictions, and patterns in functioning and development of interregional and inter-municipal cooperation institutions. Contradictions in the encountered institutions functioning have been highlighted in their powers and performance. Among the trends in the institutions development the following have been noted: management decentralization, strengthening of the regional and municipal authorities role in planning and implementation of spatial development projects, vector for strengthening sustainability, sustainable development principles integration in strategies and projects that allows to consider not only economic and environmental aspects in planning, but also social ones, strengthening of innovativeness and financing of interregional and inter-municipal cooperation institutions, spatial development management digitalization, public participation in solving problems of improving interregional and inter-municipal cooperation, and strengthening of international cooperation in relevant projects implementation. Among the patterns in the institutions development it is necessary to define their focus on functioning in the context of horizontal links globalization, growth of development sustainability and population mobility, digitalization and innovativeness, ensuring security on the basis of risk management, which implies legal integration and standards harmonization, intensive exchange of the best projects, activation of local authorities and population in projects implementation. The author’s proposals for improving institutions in modern conditions include transition to the project approach, reorientation of the policy in this area to ensure mutual benefit, and priority in supporting projects of inter-territorial importance, capable of ensuring territorial connectivity and unity of economic space.
Keywords
About the Authors
R. F. GataullinRussian Federation
Rinat F. Gataullin, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Economics and Spatial Development Management Sector
Ufa
E. R. Chuvashaeva
Russian Federation
Elvira R. Chuvashaeva, Researcher
Ufa
References
1. Blaug M. Economic thought in retrospect. Moscow: Delo; 1994. 687 p. (In Russian).
2. Egorov K.I. Evolution of international trade theories and modernity: adaptation attempts. Journal of Economic Studies. 2019;3:88–92. (In Russian).
3. Akamatsu K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies. 1962;1:3–25.
4. Bourdieu P. Economic anthropology: lecture course at the College de France (1992–1993). Moscow: Delo; 2019. 418 p. (In French).
5. Vdovkina E.G. Evolution of theories of spatial development. Current issues of humanities and natural sciences. 2012;1:41–45. (In Russian).
6. Peftiev V.I. Reflections of a humanitarian on the past and present. Yaroslavl: Avers Press; 2002. 199 p. (In Russian).
7. Samsonov V.B. et al. Territorial organization of society. Saratov: Volzhsky Sad; 1999. 244 p. (In Russian).
8. Treivish A.I. Unevenness and Structural Diversity of the Economy’s Spatial Development. As a Scientific Problem and Russian Reality. Regional Research of Russia. 2020;2(10):143–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S207997052002015X
9. Rogachev S.B. The law of preservation of geographical space, or fast does not happen well. Geografiya. Pervoe sentyabrya. 2002;10:17–19. (In Russian).
10. Gusev D.N. Deformation of socio-economic space of synergetically oriented entrepreneurship in the process of market reform of the Russian economy. Vestnik of the Military University. 2009;4(20):98–103. (In Russian).
11. Gataullin R.F., Chuvashaeva E.R. Ensuring homogeneity of regional socio-economic development: Republic of Bashkortostan case study. Vestnik universiteta. 2023;1:100–105. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-100-105
12. Gataullin R.F. (ed.) Spatial development based on interterritorial interaction activation. Ufa: Institute of Social and Economic Research of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2022. 270 p. (In Russian).
13. Altufieva T.Yu. et al. Strategic plan for economic development of the Ufa City District of the Republic of Bashkortostan until 2030. Ufa: Institute of Social and Economic Research of the Ufa Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2015. 284 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Gataullin R.F., Chuvashaeva E.R. Trends, contradictions, and patterns of functioning of interregional and inter-municipal cooperation institutions. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(12):50-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2024-12-50-57