Comparison of project management standards (PMBOK, P2M, and PRINCE2) from the cultural perspective
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-4-19-33
Abstract
A comparative analysis of three leading project management standards — PMBOK (United States of America), P2M (Japan) and PRINCE2 (Great Britain) — with an emphasis on their cultural characteristics is been carried out. The purpose of the study is to identify and systematize the value orientations embedded in each standard under the influence of the national mentality, historical context, and business culture of the country of origin. The methodological basis of the study is based on the integrated use of comparative analysis, contextual reading of the standards’ documentation, as well as a generalizing interpretation of key provisions set out in official manuals and publications.
The research paper reveals how cultural characteristics are reflected in approaches to individualism or collectivism, task orientation or interpersonal relationships, as well as in the expected personal qualities of employees. The study results show that the PMBOK is focused on individualism and value creation, the P2M is focused on collectivism and innovative transformation, and the PRINCE2 combines elements of both approaches, focusing on a controlled environment.
The study highlights the importance of considering the cultural characteristics of each country. They have a significant impact on the perception and application of the standards, which is important when implementing and adapting the standards in international project management practice.
About the Authors
A. S. Zakroeva
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia S. Zakroeva - Student
Moscow
G. P. Tamoyan
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gleb P. Tamoyan - Student
Moscow
A. S. Emelianova
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia S. Emelianova - Student
Moscow
P. V. Pavlovskiy
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Pavlovskiy - Senior Lecturer at the Project Management Department
Moscow
Yu. A. Fomina
State University of Management
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Fomina - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof. at the Project Management Department
Moscow
References
1. Shkarlet, S., Dorosh, M., Druzhynin, O., Voitsekhovska, M., & Bohdan, I. (2021). Modeling of information security management system in the project. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1265, 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58124-4_35
2. Sheykhova, M. S., Elkina, E. A. (2023). The meaning and characteristics of project management systems, their differences on the example of AGILE and PRINCE2. Humanitarian bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University, 4, 168–178. (In Russian).
3. Simonaitis, A., Dauksys, M., & Mockiene, J. (2023). A Comparison of the Project Management Methodologies PRINCE2 and PMBOK in Managing Repetitive Construction Projects. Buildings, 13(7), 1796. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071796
4. Weinberg, R.R., Moiseev, N. A., & Sakharova, S. M. (2020). Application of Project Management Standards in the IT Industry: PRINCE2 and PMBOK. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian Academy of Economics, 1(109). (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-1-56-66
5. Esteki, M., Gandomani, T. J., & Farsani H. K. (2020). A risk management framework for distributed scrum using PRINCE2 methodology. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(3), 1299–1310. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i3.1905
6. Gilmanov, T. D., Saifullin, T. A., Yushchenko, Yu. E., & Khalimon, E. A. (2021). Analysis of Best Practices for Implementing Lean Project and Program Management Technologies in Russia. Bulletin of the University, 3, 98–104. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-3-98-104
7. Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2021). Organizational culture and project management methodology: research in the financial industry. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(6), 1270–1289. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-08-2020-0252
8. Zaritskaya, Zh. V. (2014). The heuristic potential of Hofstede’s methodology for studying the values of individualism and collectivism. Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Philosophy, 12(1), 56–63. (In Russian).
9. Hampden-Turner, C., Trompenaars, F. (1993). The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands. International Affairs, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2623748
10. Voskresenskaya, D. M., Khalimon, E. A., Nesterova, M. A., & Tsipes, G. L. (2021). Review of the third edition of the Japanese project management standard P2M PMAJ. Project and Program Management, 3, 204–214. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.36627/2075-1214-2021-3-3-204-214
11. Ruzinskaya, A. I., Vladimirenko, M. Y. (2016). The Problem of Interaction between Business Cultures of Japan and Russia. Problems of Modern Science and Education, 40(82), 113–118. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.2307/2623748
12. Kharlamov, I. V., Butkevich, A. S. (2023). Systems approach: synergy of process and project approaches. Journal of Innovations and Investments, 7, 68–71. (In Russian).
13. Zein, O. (2012). Cultural complexities in multinational projects. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012. Marsailles: EMEA.
Review
For citations:
Zakroeva A.S., Tamoyan G.P., Emelianova A.S., Pavlovskiy P.V., Fomina Yu.A. Comparison of project management standards (PMBOK, P2M, and PRINCE2) from the cultural perspective. Vestnik Universiteta. 2026;(4):19-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2026-4-19-33
Views:
56
JATS XML
Email this article 